Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Presupposition, anaphora, and lexical content

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Text Understanding in LILOG

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 546))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asher, N. 1989: Abstract Objects, Semantics and Anaphora. Ms., Department of Philosophy and Center for Cognitive Science, University of Texas, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, G. 1985: Mental Spaces. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G. 1979: Pragmatics. Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J.A.G., and M.B.J. Stokhof 1991: Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 39–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. 1982: The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. 1983: On the projection problem for presuppositions. In: Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 2: 114–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. 1981: A theory of truth and semantic representation. In: J.A.G. Groenendijk, T.M.V. Janssen, and M.B.J. Stokhof (eds.) 1981: Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, Amsterdam. Pp. 277–322. Reprinted in: J.A.G. Groenendijk, T.M.V. Janssen, and M.B.J. Stokhof (eds.) 1984: Truth, Interpretation, and Information; Selected Papers from the Third Amsterdam Colloquium. Foris, Dordrecht. Pp. 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. 1973: Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 167–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. 1974: Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1.1: 181–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. and S. Peters, 1979: Conventional implicature. In: C.-K. Oh and D. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition. Academic Press, New York. Pp. 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langendoen, D.T., and H. Savin 1971: The projection problem for presuppositions. In: C. Fillmore and D.T. Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics. Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1979: Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8:339–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J.D. 1979: Presupposition and discourse structure. In: C.-K. Oh and D. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition. Academic Press, New York. Pp. 371–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, R. to appear: Default logic and presuppositions: simple sentences and beyond.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter, R. 1980: A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13: 81–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyle, U. 1985: Grammatical functions, quantification and discourse referents. IJCAI 9: 829–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. 1987: Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity. Ph.D Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells, P. 1985: Restrictive and non-restrictive modification. CSLI Report No. 85-28, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuren, P.A.M. 1985: Discourse Semantics. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. 1979: A projection problem for speaker presuppositions. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 623–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S. 1982: How presuppositions are inherited: a solution to the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 483–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.C. 1973: Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 447–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.C. 1974: Pragmatic presuppositions. In: M.K. Munitz and P.K. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy. New York University Press, New York. Pp. 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.C. 1978: Assertion. In: P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9: Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. 1950: On referring. Mind 59: 320–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sandt, R.A. 1988: Context and Presupposition. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sandt, R.A. 1989: Presupposition and discourse structure. In: R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and Contextual Expresssion. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sandt, R.A. to appear: Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeevat, H. 1991: Aspects of Discourse Semantics and Unification Grammar. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeevat, H., E. Klein, and J. Calder 1987: Unification categorial grammar. Edinburgh Research Papers in Cognitive Science, No. EUCCS/RP-21, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Rob A. van der Sandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bart Geurts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Otthein Herzog Claus-Rainer Rollinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Sandt, R.A., Geurts, B. (1991). Presupposition, anaphora, and lexical content. In: Herzog, O., Rollinger, CR. (eds) Text Understanding in LILOG. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 546. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54594-8_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54594-8_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54594-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38493-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation