Skip to main content

Towards the integration of different knowledge sources in model-based diagnosis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Artificial Intelligence (AI*IA 1991)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 549))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Over the last few years several attempts have been made to design diagnostic systems which combine more than one model of the system to be diagnosed or more than one reasoning mechanism. In this paper we analyze the integration of different knowledge sources in model-based diagnosis, and, in particular, abductive diagnosis. We consider behavioral models in which the interaction between processes can be represented, enriched with constraints and taxonomic relationships among diagnostic hypotheses. We provide several insights into the role of such forms of knowledge in model-based diagnosis, showing how they can be accommodated both in a meta-level definition of abduction with constraints and in an object-level framework for abduction.

The research described in this paper has been partially supported by grants from MPI 40% (Automated Reasoning Techniques for Intelligent Systems) and CNR (Progetto Finalizzato “Sistemi Informatici e Calcolo Parallelo”, under grant n. 90.00689.PF69).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abu-Hanna, A., Benjamins, R., and Jansweijer, W., “Functional Models in Diagnostic Reasoning,” pp. 243–256 in Proc. 11th Int. Work, on Expert Systems and Their Applications (Conf. on 2nd Generation Expert Systems), Avignon (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apt, K.R. and Bezem, M., “Acyclic programs,” pp. 617–633 in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, MIT Press, Jerusalem (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bylander, T., Allemang, D., Tanner, M., and Josephson, J., “Some Results Concerning the Computational Complexity of Abduction,” pp. 44–54 in Proc. 1st Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Toronto (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chittaro, L., Costantini, C., Guida, G., Tasso, C., and Toppano, E., “Diagnosis Based on Cooperation of Multiple Knowledge Sources,” pp. 19–33 in Proc. 9th Int. Work. on Expert Systems and Their Applications (Conf. on 2nd Generation Expert Systems), Avignon (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, K., “Negation as failure,” pp. 293–322 in Logic and Data Bases, ed. H. Gallaire, J. Minker,Plenum Press, New York (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Console, L., Portinale, L., and Theseider Dupré, D., “Focusing Abductive Diagnosis,” pp. 231–242 in Proc. 11th Int. Work. on Expert Systems and Their Applications (Conf. on 2nd Generation Expert Systems), Avignon (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Console, L., Theseider Dupre', D., and Torasso, P., “Abductive Reasoning through Direct Deduction from Completed Domain Models,” pp. 175–182 in Methodologies for Intelligent Systems 4, ed. Z. Ras, North Holland (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Console, L., Theseider Dupré, D., and Torasso, P., “On the Relationship between Abduction and Deduction,” to appear in Journal of Logic and Computation, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Console, L., Theseider Dupré, D., and Torasso, P., “A Theory of Diagnosis for Incomplete Causal Models,” pp. 1311–1317 in Proc. 11th IJCAI, Detroit (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Console, L. and Torasso, P., “Integrating Models of the Correct Behavior into Abductive Diagnosis,” pp. 160–166 in Proc. 9th ECAI, Stockholm (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cox, P.T. and Pietrzykowski, T., “General Diagnosis by Abductive Inference,” pp. 183–189 in Proc. IEEE Symposium on Logic Programming, San Francisco (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Davis, R. and Hamscher, W., “Model-based reasoning: Troubleshooting,” pp. 297–346 in Exploring Artificial Intelligence, ed. H.E. Shrobe,Morgan Kaufman (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. DeKleer, J., Mackworth, A., and Reiter, R., “Characterizing Diagnoses,” pp. 318–323 in Proc. AAAI 90, Boston (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. DeKleer, J. and Williams, B.C., “Diagnosing Multiple Faults,” Artificial Intelligence 32 pp. 97–130 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. DeKleer, J. and Williams, B.C., “Diagnosis with behavioral modes,” pp. 1324–1330 in Proc. 11th IJCAI, Detroit (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eshghi, K. and Kowalski, R., “Abduction Compared with Negation as Failure,” pp. 234–254 in Proc. 6th Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, MIT Press, Lisbon (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Friedrich, G., Gottlob, G., and Nejdl, W., “Physical Impossibility Instead of Fault Models,” pp. 331–336 in Proc. AAAI 90, Boston (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kowalski, R. and Sadri, F., “Knowledge Representation without Integrity Constraints,” Technical Report, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patil, R., “Causal representation of patient illness for electrolyte and acid-base diagnosis,” MIT/LCS/TR-267, Cambridge (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pearl, J., Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems, Morgan Kaufmann (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Poole, D., “Explanation and Prediction: An Architecture for Default and Abductive Reasoning,” Computational Intelligence 5 (1) pp. 97–110 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Poole, D., Goebel, R., and Aleliunas, R., “Theorist: a logical reasoning system for default and diagnosis,” pp. 331–352 in The Knowledge Frontier, ed. N. Cercone, G. Mc Calla,Springer Verlag (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Raiman, O., “Diagnosis as a Trial: The Alibi Principle,” in Proc. Int. Workshop on Model-based Diagnosis, Paris (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reiter, R., “A Theory of Diagnosis from First Principles,” Artificial Intelligence 32 pp. 57–96 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Selman, B. and Levesque, H., “Abductive and Default Reasoning: A Computational Core,” pp. 343–348 in Proc. AAAI 90, Boston (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shanahan, M., “Prediction is Deduction but Explanation is Abduction,” pp. 1055–1060 in Proc. 11th IJCAI, Detroit (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Struss, P. and Dressler, O., “Physical Negation — Integrating Fault Models into the General Diagnostic Engine,” pp. 1318–1323 in Proc. 11th IJCAI, Detroit (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Torasso, P. and Console, L., Diagnostic Problem Solving: Combining Heuristic, Approximate and Causal Reasoning, Van Nostrand Reinhold (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Edoardo Ardizzone Salvatore Gaglio Filippo Sorbello

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Console, L., Theseider Dupre, D., Torasso, P. (1991). Towards the integration of different knowledge sources in model-based diagnosis. In: Ardizzone, E., Gaglio, S., Sorbello, F. (eds) Trends in Artificial Intelligence. AI*IA 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 549. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54712-6_230

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54712-6_230

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54712-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46443-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics