Compositional checking of satisfaction

Abstract

We present a compositional method for deciding whether a process satisfies an assertion. Assertions are formulae in a modal v-calculus, and processes are drawn from a very general process algebra inspired by CCS and CSP. Well-known operators from CCS, CSP, and other process algebras appear as derived operators.

The method is compositional in the structure of processes and works purely on the syntax of processes. It consists of applying a sequence of reductions, each of which only take into account the top-level operator of the process. A reduction transforms a satisfaction problem for a composite process into equivalent satisfaction problems for the immediate subcomponents.

Using process variables, systems with undefined subcomponents can be defined, and given an overall requirement to the system, necessary and sufficient conditions on these subcomponents can be found. Hence the process variables make it possible to specify and reason about what are often referred to as contexts, environments, and partial implementations.

As reductions are algorithms that work on syntax, they can be considered as forming a bridge between traditional non-compositional model checking and compositional proof systems.

This work is supported by the ESPRIT Basic Research Actions CEDISYS and CLICS, and for the first author also by the Danish Natural Science Research Council.

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.