Skip to main content

PUNDIT — Natural language interfaces

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Programming in Action (LPSS 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 636))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 132 Accesses

Abstract

The PUNDIT natural language understanding system is a modular system implemented in Prolog which consists of distinct modules for syntactic,semantic, and pragmatic analysis. A central goal underlying PUNDIT's design is that the basic natural language processing functions should be independent of the system's domain of application and application. This approach to the design of natural language processing systems is motivated by the fact that in order to be practical, natural language systems must not require reimplementation of most of the system as they are ported to different domains. Thus, our goal in the design of PUNDIT is to reduce as much as possible the amount of effort that must be done to move the system to different applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Catherine N. Ball, Deborah Dahl, Lewis M. Norton, Lynette Hirschman, Carl Weir, and Marcia Linebarger. Answers and questions: Processing messages and queries. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, Cape Cod, MA, October 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deborah A. Dahl. Focusing and reference resolution in PUNDIT. In Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Philadelphia, PA, August 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deborah A. Dahl. Determiners, entities, and contexts. In Proceedings of TINLAP-3, Las Cruces, NM, January 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deborah A. Dahl. Evaluation of pragmatics processing in a direction finding domain. In Proceedings of the Fifth Rocky Mountain Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Las Cruces, New Mexico, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deborah A. Dahl. Applications of training data in semantic processing, March 1991. AAAI Spring Symposium.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deborah A. Dahl and Catherine N. Ball. Reference resolution in PUNDIT. In P. Saint-Dizier and S. Szpakowicz, editors, Logic and logic grammars for language processing. Ellis Horwood Limited, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deborah A. Dahl, Lynette Hirschman, Lewis M. Norton, Marcia C. Linebarger, David Magerman, and Catherine N. Ball. Training and evaluation of a spoken language understanding system. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Language Workshop, Hidden Valley, PA, June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deborah A. Dahl, Martha S. Palmer, and Rebecca J. Passonneau. Nominalizations in PUNDIT. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, July 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Dowding and Lynette Hirschman. Dynamic translation for rule pruning in restriction grammar. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop On Natural Language Understanding and Logic Programming, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Fillmore. The case for case. In Bach and Harms, editors, Universals in Linguistic Theory, pages 1–88. Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lynette Hirschman. Conjunction in meta-restriction grammar. Journal of Logic Programming, 4:299–328, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lynette Hirschman. A meta-rule treatment for English wh-constructions. In Proceedings of META88 Workshop on Meta-Programming in Logic Programming. University of Bristol, Bristol, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lynette Hirschman and John Dowding. Restriction grammar: A logic grammar. In P. Saint-Dizier and S. Szpakowicz, editors, Logic and Logic Grammars for Language Processing, pages 141–167. Ellis Horwood, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fran,cois-Michel Lang and Lynette Hirschman. Improved portability and parsing through interactive acquisition of semantic information. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Austin, TX, February 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marcia C. Linebarger, Deborah A. Dahl, Lynette Hirschman, and Rebecca J. Passonneau. Sentence fragments regular structures. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Buffalo, NY, June 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. David L. Matuszek. K-Pack: A programmer's interface to KNET. Technical Memo 61, Unisys Corporation, P.O. Box 517, Paoli, PA 19301, October 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lewis M. Norton, Deborah A. Dahl, Donald P. McKay, Lynette Hirschman, Marcia C. Linebarger, David Magerman, and Catherine N. Ball. Management and evaluation of interactive dialog in the air travel domain. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Language Workshop, Hidden Valley, PA, June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis M. Norton, Marcia C. Linebarger, Deborah A. Dahl, and Nghi Nguyen. Augmented role filling capabilities for semantic interpretation of natural language. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Language Workshop, Pacific Grove, CA, February, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. David S. Pallett. DARPA resource management and ATIS benchmark poster session. In Proceedings of the DARPA Speech and Language Workshop, Pacific Grove, CA, February, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martha Palmer. Semantic Processing for Finite Domains. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martha S. Palmer, Deborah A. Dahl, Rebecca J. Schiffman. Passonneau, Lynette Hirschman, Marcia Linebarger, and John Dowding. Recovering implicit information. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Columbia University, New York, August 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rebecca J. Passonneau. A computational model of the semantics of tense and aspect. Computational Linguistics, 14(2):44–60, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Naomi Sager. Natural Language Information Processing: A Computer Grammar of English and Its Applications. Addison-Wesley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

G. Comyn N. E. Fuchs M. J. Ratcliffe

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dahl, D.A. (1992). PUNDIT — Natural language interfaces. In: Comyn, G., Fuchs, N.E., Ratcliffe, M.J. (eds) Logic Programming in Action. LPSS 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 636. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55930-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55930-2_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-55930-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47312-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics