Skip to main content

Membership algorithms for multicast communication groups

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Distributed Algorithms (WDAG 1992)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 647))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce a membership protocol that maintains the set of currently connected machines in an asynchronous and dynamic environment. The protocol handles both failures and joining of machines. It operates within a multicast communication sub-system.

It is well known that solving the membership problem in an asynchronous environment when faults may be present is impossible. In order to circumvent this difficulty, our approach rarely extracts from the membership live (but not active) machines unjustfully. The benefit is that our procotol always terminates within a finite time. In addition, if a machine is inadvertently taken out of the membership, it can rejoin it right away using the membership protocol.

Despite the asynchrony, configuration changes are logically synchronized with all the regular messages in the system, and appear virtually synchronous to the application layer.

The protocol presented here supports partitions and merges. When partitions and merging occur, the protocol provides the application with exact information about the status of the system. It is up to the application designer to merge the partitioned histories correctly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Amir, D. Dolev, S. Kramer, and D. Malki. Total ordering of messages in broadcast domains. Technical Report CS92-9, Dept. of Comp. Sci., the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Amir, D. Dolev, S. Kramer, and D. Malki. Transis: A communication subsystem for high availability. In FTCS conference, number 22, pages 76–84, July 1992. previous version available as TR CS91-13, Dept. of Comp. Sci., the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Birman, R. Cooper, and B. Gleeson. Programming with process groups: Group and multicast semantics. TR 91-1185, dept. of Computer Science, Cornell University, Jan 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Birman and T. Joseph. Exploiting virtual synchrony in distributed systems. In Ann. Symp. Operating Systems Principles, number 11, pages 123–138. ACM, Nov 87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Birman, A. Schiper, and P. Stephenson. Lightweight causal and atomic group multicast. TR 91-1192, dept. of comp. sci., Conrell University, 91. revised version of ‘fast causal multicast'.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Cristian. Reaching agreement on processor group membership in synchronous distributed systems. Research Report RJ 5964, IBM Almaden Research Center, Mar. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. Dolev, C. Dwork, and L. Stockmeyer. On the minimal synchrony needed for distributed consensus. J. ACM, 34(1):77–97, Jan. 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Fischer, N. Lynch, and M. Paterson. Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. J. ACM, 32:374–382, April 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Griefer and R. Strong. Dcf: Distributed communication with fault tolerance. In Ann. Symp. Principles of Distributed Computing, number 7, pages 18–27, August 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Lamport. Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system. Comm. ACM, 21(7):558–565, July 78.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. M. Melliar-Smith, L. E. Moser, and V. Agrawala. Broadcast protocols for distributed systems. IEEE Trans. Parallel & Distributed Syst., (1), Jan 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. M. Melliar-Smith, L. E. Moser, and V. Agrawala. Membership algorithms for asynchronous distributed systems. In Intl. Conf. Distributed Computing Systems, May 91.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mishra, L. L. Peterson, and R. D. Schlichting. A membership protocol based on partial order. In proc. of the intl. working conf. on Dependable Computing for Critical Applications, Feb 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. L. Peterson, N. C. Buchholz, and R. D. Schlichting. Preserving and using context information in interprocess communication. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 7(3):217–246, August 89.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. M. Ricciardi and K. P. Birman. Using process groups to implement failure detection in asynchronous environments. TR 91-1188, Dept. of Computer Science, Cornell University, Feb 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Adrian Segall Shmuel Zaks

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Amir, Y., Dolev, D., Kramer, S., Malki, D. (1992). Membership algorithms for multicast communication groups. In: Segall, A., Zaks, S. (eds) Distributed Algorithms. WDAG 1992. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 647. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56188-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56188-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56188-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47484-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics