Skip to main content

Ordered paramodulation and resolution as decision procedure

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning (LPAR 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 698))

Abstract

In recent years interesting decidability results for syntactically specified classes of clause sets have been achieved by employing resolution as a decision procedure. We extend this line of research by considering also clauses with equality literals. We use a special version of ordered paramodulation and resolution to decide a class of clause sets that corresponds to an extension of the Ackermann class with equality (i.e., prenex formulas with prefixes of type ∃*∀∃*). By encoding Turing machines we also show that slight modifications of the defining conditions for this class lead to undecidability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Bachmair, H. Ganzinger, and U. Waldmann. Superposition with simplification as a decision procedure for the monadic class with equality. In Third Kurt Gödel Colloquium 1993, LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 1993. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Dreben and W. D. Goldfarb. The Decision Problem. Addison-Wesley, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Fermüller, A. Leitsch, T. Tammet, and N. Zamov. Resolution Methods for the Decision Problem. LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 1993. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Gottlob and C. Fermüller. Removing redundancy from a clause. J. Artificial Intelligence, 1993. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. D. Goldfarb. The unsolvability of the Gödel class with identity. JSL, 49:1237–1252, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Gurevich. Formuly s odnim ∀ (formulas with one ∀). In Izbrannye Voprosy Algebry i Logiki (Selected Questions in Algebra and Logic—in Memory of A. Mal'cev), pages 97–100. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Hsiang and M. Rusinowitch. Proving refutational completeness of theorem-proving strategies: The transfinite semantic tree method. JACM, 38(3):559–587, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. H. Joyner. Resolution strategies as decision procedures. JACM, 23(1):398–417, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Rusinowitch. Theorem-proving with resolution and superposition. JSC, 11:21–49, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. van Emde Boas. Machine models and simulations. In Jan van Leeuwen, editor, Algorithms and Complexity, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. A, pages 1–66. Elsevier, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Christian Fermüller or Gernot Salzer .

Editor information

Andrei Voronkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fermüller, C., Salzer, G. (1993). Ordered paramodulation and resolution as decision procedure. In: Voronkov, A. (eds) Logic Programming and Automated Reasoning. LPAR 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 698. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56944-8_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-56944-8_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56944-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47830-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics