Skip to main content

Critical issues in the evaluation of spatial autocorrelation

  • Spatial Analysis
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS (COSIT 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 716))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Spatial autocorrelation measures the degree to which a spatial phenomenon is correlated with itself in space. As such, it can be used as an indicator of the fundamental topological structure of the spatial relationship among geographic entities displayed on a map. Statistics of spatial autocorrelation are especially useful for characterizing the spatial pattern in the distribution of any phenomenon in question. This paper addresses three important issues pertaining to the evaluation of spatial autocorrelation: measurement of the study variable, definition of geographic units, and specification of spatial weighting functions. Theoretically, spatial autocorrelation is most adequately evaluated when the study variable is measured in either an interval or a ratio scale and geographic units are better delineated by polygons of homogeneous surfaces based on variables that are significant to the distribution of the study phenomenon. In evaluating spatial autocorrelation, weighting functions such as area, boundary length, distance, and their combinations must be examined carefully and specified whenever necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Y.H. Chou: Map resolution and spatial autocorrelation. Geographical Analysis, 23, 228–246 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y.H. Chou: Management of wildfires with a geographical information system. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 6, 123–140 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y.H. Chou: Spatial autocorrelation and weighting functions in the distribution of wildland fires. International journal of Wildland Fire, 2, 169–176 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y.H. Chou, R. A. Minnich, and R.A. Chase: Mapping probability of fire occurrence in the San Jacinto Mountains, California. Environmental Management, 17, 129–140 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. AD. Cliff and J.K. Ord: Spatial Processes: Models and Applications, London: Pion (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.F. Dacey: A review of measures of contiguity for two and K-color maps, in B.J.L. Barry and D.F. Marble (editors), Spatial Analyses: A Reader in Statistical Geography, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.C. Geary: The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping, The Incorporated Statistician, 5, 115–145 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Getis: A spatial association model approach to the identification of spatial dependence, Geographical Analysis, 16, 17–24 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Getis: Spatial interaction and spatial autocorrelation: a cross-product approach, Environment and Planning A, 23, 1269–1277 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Getis and J.K. Ord: The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics, Geographical Analysis, 24, 189–206 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Haggett: Hybridizing alternative models of an epidemic diffusion process, Economic Geography, 52, 136–146 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. de Jong, C. Sprenger, and F. van Veen: On extreme values of Moran's / and Geary's C, Geographical Analysis, 16, 17–24 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P.A.P. Moran: The interpretation of statistical maps, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 37, 243–51 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P.A.P. Moran: Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena, Biometrika, 37, 17–23 (1950)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. J. O'Loughlin: Spatial models of international conflicts: extending current theories of war behavior, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 76, 63–80(1986).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W.R. Tobler: A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, Economic Geography, 46, 234–240 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Andrew U. Frank Irene Campari

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chou, YH. (1993). Critical issues in the evaluation of spatial autocorrelation. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I. (eds) Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 716. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57207-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57207-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57207-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47966-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics