Abstract
In the course of discussions on designing a socially acceptable technology greater importance has recently been attached to criteria such as flexibility, adaptability and configurativity. The related idea of a “soft” technology that can be adapted and moulded to changing conditions “on the ground” (i.e. within the field of application) has gradually developed in computer science and led to several new concepts of varying breadth. As an issue of software-ergonomics it was first discussed in the 1980s under the concept of “individualization” and found its way into various guidelines and evaluative frameworks for the human-oriented design of application software [9]. Here, discussion first centred on the question of adapting application systems to personal characteristics of the user, such as this level of expertise in using the system, individual preferences for utilizing the system as a result of individual differences in style of acting, thinking and learning etc. In this discussion the research domain expanded step by step to problems of tasks and organizational contexts. Consequently, in software ergonomics we now speak of four mutually influencing factors (and thereby design factors): human, technology, tasks and organization. The following paper is based on research conducted as part of the SAGA project at the GMD (German National Research Center for Computer Science). This research drew on psychological and sociological investigations in order to examine the practical relevance and software-ergonomic quality of flexible systems. The point of departure for our investigations was a debate, which had already begun some time ago in computer Science, on suitable forms for the technical realization of system adaptation.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J.R.: The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, Mass. 1983: Harvard University Press
Bauer, J. et al.: Hilfesysteme. In: Fähnrich, K. P. (Hg.): Software-Ergonomie. State of the Art. München — Wien 1987: Oldenbourg. S. 118–128
Benyon, D. & Murray, D. (1988): Experience with adaptive interfaces. In: The Computer Journal, 31, S. 465–473.
Benyon, D., Innocent, P. & Murray, D. (1987): System adaptivity and the modelling of stereotypes. In: Bullinger, H.-J. & Shackel, B. (Eds): Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT '87.
Carroll, J.M.; Carrithers, C.: Training Wheels in a User Interface. Communication of the ACM. Vol. 27. pp. 800–806
Eberleh, E.: Beschreibung, Klassifikation und mentale Repräsentation komplexer Mensch-Computer-Interaktion. Regensburg 1989
Falck, M.: Arbeit in der Organisation. Zur Rolle der Kommunikation als Arbeit in der Arbeit und als Gegenstand technischer Gestaltung. Arbeitspapier Berlin
Hacker, W.: Allgemeine Arbeits-und Ingebieurpsychologie. Psychische Struktur und Regulation von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Bern — Stuttgart — Wien 1978: Huber
ISO-9241: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Part 10: Dialogue Principles. First Commitee Draft. 1991
Johnson-Laird, P. N.: Mental Models. Cambridge, Mass. 1983: Cambridge University Press
Karger, C.; Oppermann, R.: Empirische Nutzungsuntersuchung adaptierbarer Schnittstelleneigenschaften. In: Ackermann, D.; Ulich, E. (Ed.): Software-Ergonomie '91. Benutzerorientierte Software-Entwicklung. Stuttgart 1991: Teubner. pp. 272–280
Kieser, A.; Kubicek, H.: Organisationstheorien. Band I und II. Stuttgart 1978: Kohlhammer
Koslowski, K.: Unterstützung von partizipativer Systementwicklung durch Methoden des Software Engineering. Arbeitspapiere der GMD Nr. 242. Februar 1987. GMD
Krogsaeter, M. et al.: Flexel: adding flexibility to a comercially available software system. Engineering for Human-Computer-Interaction. Proceedings of the 5th International IFIP-Working Conference on User Interfaces, 1992, August 10–14. Ellivuori, Finland 1992
Luhmann, N.: Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main 1987: Suhrkamp
Minsky, M.: Framework for Representing Knowledge in Mind Design. In: Haugeland, J. (Hg.): Readings in Knowledge Representation. Cambridge, Mass.. 1981: MIT-Press. S. 95–128
Norman, D. A.; Rumelhart, D. E.: Explorations in Cognition. San Francisco 1975: Freeman & Co.
Paetau, M.: Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation. Software, Gestaltungspotentiale, Sozialverträglichkeit. Frankfurt am Main — New York 1990: Campus
Parsons, T.; Shils, E. (Hg.): Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge (Mass.) 1951
Quast, K.-J.: PLANET. Planerkennung mit aktivierten Handlungsnetzen. GMD-Studie Nr. 195. Juli 1991. GMD
Türk, K.: Neuere Entwicklungen in der Organisationsforschung. Ein Trend Report. Stuttgart 1989: Enke
Ulich, E.: Über das Prinzip der differentiellen Arbeitsgestaltung. Industrielle Organisation. 47 (1978). pp. 566–568
VDI-5005: Richtlinie “Software-Ergonomie in der Bürokommunikation”. Düsseldorf 1990: VDI
Weber, M.: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen 1972: Mohr
Weltz, F.: Wer wird Herr der Systeme? Der Einsatz neuer Bürotechnologie und die innerbetriebliche Handlungskonstellation. In: Seltz, R.; Mill, R.; Hildebrandt, E. (Ed.): Organisation als soziales System. Berlin 1986: Sigma, pp. 151–161
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Paetau, M. (1993). System-adaptation and reality's own dynamism. In: Grechenig, T., Tscheligi, M. (eds) Human Computer Interaction. VCHCI 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 733. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57312-7_83
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57312-7_83
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57312-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48052-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive