Skip to main content

On aggregating teams of learning machines

  • Selected Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 1993)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 744))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The present paper studies the problem of when a team of learning machines can be aggregated into a single learning machine without any loss in learning power. The main results concern aggregation ratios for vacillatory identification of languages from texts. For a positive integer n, a machine is said to TxtFex n-identify a language L just in case the machine converges to upto n grammars for L on any text for L. For such identification criteria, the aggregation ratio is derived for the n=2 case. It is shown that the collection of languages that can be TxtFex2 identified by teams with success ratio greater than 5/6 are the same as those collections of languages that can be TxtFex 2-identified by a single machine. It is also established that 5/6 is indeed the cut-off point by showing that there are collections of languages that can be TxtFex2-identified by a team employing 6 machines, at least 5 of which are required to be successful, but cannnot be TxtFex2-identified by any single machine. Additionally, aggregation ratios are also derived for finite identification of languages from positive data and for numerous criteria involving language learning from both positive and negative data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. M. Barzdin. Two theorems on the limiting synthesis of functions. In Theory of Algorithms and Programs, Latvian State University, Riga, 210:82–88, 1974. In Russian.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Barzdin and K. Podnieks. The theory of inductive inference. In Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Blum. A machine independent theory of the complexity of recursive functions. Journal of the ACM, 14:322–336, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Case. Periodicity in generations of automata. Mathematical Systems Theory, 8:15–32, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Case. The power of vacillation. In D. Haussler and L. Pitt, editors, Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 133–142. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1988. Expanded in [6].

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Case. The power of vacillation in language learning. Technical Report 93-08, University of Delaware, 1992. Expands on [5]; journal article under review.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Case and C. Lynes. Machine inductive inference and language identification. In M. Nielsen and E. M. Schmidt, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, volume 140, pages 107–115. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Case and C. Smith. Comparison of identification criteria for machine inductive inference. Theoretical Computer Science, 25:193–220, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Freivalds. Functions computable in the limit by probabilistic machines. Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. M. Gold. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10:447–474, 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Hopcroft and J. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Jain and A. Sharma. Finite learning by a team. In M. Fulk and J. Case, editors, Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Rochester, New York, pages 163–177. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., August 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Jain and A. Sharma. Language learning by a team. In M. S. Paterson, editor, Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, pages 153–166. Springer-Verlag, July 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Jain and A. Sharma. Computational limits on team identification of languages. Technical Report 9301, School of Computer Science and Engineering; University of New S outh Wales, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Jain and A. Sharma. Probability is more powerful than team for language identification. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Santa Cruz, California. ACM Press, July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Machtey and P. Young. An Introduction to the General Theory of Algorithms. North Holland, New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. Aggregating inductive expertise. Information and Control, 70:69–95, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. Systems that Learn, An Introduction to Learning Theory for Cognitive and Computer Scientists. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. Osherson and S. Weinstein. Criteria of language learning. Information and Control, 52:123–138, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. L. Pitt. A characterization of probabilistic inference. PhD thesis, Yale University, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Pitt and C. Smith. Probability and plurality for aggregations of learning machines. Information and Computation, 77:77–92, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Rogers. Gödel numberings of partial recursive functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23:331–341, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Rogers. Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967. Reprinted, MIT Press 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Smith. The power of pluralism for automatic program synthesis. Journal of the ACM, 29:1144–1165, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Klaus P. Jantke Shigenobu Kobayashi Etsuji Tomita Takashi Yokomori

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jain, S., Sharma, A. (1993). On aggregating teams of learning machines. In: Jantke, K.P., Kobayashi, S., Tomita, E., Yokomori, T. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 744. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57370-4_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57370-4_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57370-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48096-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics