Abstract
The present paper studies the problem of when a team of learning machines can be aggregated into a single learning machine without any loss in learning power. The main results concern aggregation ratios for vacillatory identification of languages from texts. For a positive integer n, a machine is said to TxtFex n-identify a language L just in case the machine converges to upto n grammars for L on any text for L. For such identification criteria, the aggregation ratio is derived for the n=2 case. It is shown that the collection of languages that can be TxtFex2 identified by teams with success ratio greater than 5/6 are the same as those collections of languages that can be TxtFex 2-identified by a single machine. It is also established that 5/6 is indeed the cut-off point by showing that there are collections of languages that can be TxtFex2-identified by a team employing 6 machines, at least 5 of which are required to be successful, but cannnot be TxtFex2-identified by any single machine. Additionally, aggregation ratios are also derived for finite identification of languages from positive data and for numerous criteria involving language learning from both positive and negative data.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. M. Barzdin. Two theorems on the limiting synthesis of functions. In Theory of Algorithms and Programs, Latvian State University, Riga, 210:82–88, 1974. In Russian.
J. M. Barzdin and K. Podnieks. The theory of inductive inference. In Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, 1973.
M. Blum. A machine independent theory of the complexity of recursive functions. Journal of the ACM, 14:322–336, 1967.
J. Case. Periodicity in generations of automata. Mathematical Systems Theory, 8:15–32, 1974.
J. Case. The power of vacillation. In D. Haussler and L. Pitt, editors, Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 133–142. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., 1988. Expanded in [6].
J. Case. The power of vacillation in language learning. Technical Report 93-08, University of Delaware, 1992. Expands on [5]; journal article under review.
J. Case and C. Lynes. Machine inductive inference and language identification. In M. Nielsen and E. M. Schmidt, editors, Proceedings of the 9th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, volume 140, pages 107–115. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.
J. Case and C. Smith. Comparison of identification criteria for machine inductive inference. Theoretical Computer Science, 25:193–220, 1983.
R. Freivalds. Functions computable in the limit by probabilistic machines. Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, 1975.
E. M. Gold. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10:447–474, 1967.
J. Hopcroft and J. Ullman. Introduction to Automata Theory Languages and Computation. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979.
S. Jain and A. Sharma. Finite learning by a team. In M. Fulk and J. Case, editors, Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Rochester, New York, pages 163–177. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., August 1990.
S. Jain and A. Sharma. Language learning by a team. In M. S. Paterson, editor, Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, pages 153–166. Springer-Verlag, July 1990.
S. Jain and A. Sharma. Computational limits on team identification of languages. Technical Report 9301, School of Computer Science and Engineering; University of New S outh Wales, 1993.
S. Jain and A. Sharma. Probability is more powerful than team for language identification. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, Santa Cruz, California. ACM Press, July 1993.
M. Machtey and P. Young. An Introduction to the General Theory of Algorithms. North Holland, New York, 1978.
D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. Aggregating inductive expertise. Information and Control, 70:69–95, 1986.
D. Osherson, M. Stob, and S. Weinstein. Systems that Learn, An Introduction to Learning Theory for Cognitive and Computer Scientists. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1986.
D. Osherson and S. Weinstein. Criteria of language learning. Information and Control, 52:123–138, 1982.
L. Pitt. A characterization of probabilistic inference. PhD thesis, Yale University, 1984.
L. Pitt and C. Smith. Probability and plurality for aggregations of learning machines. Information and Computation, 77:77–92, 1988.
H. Rogers. Gödel numberings of partial recursive functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23:331–341, 1958.
H. Rogers. Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967. Reprinted, MIT Press 1987.
C. Smith. The power of pluralism for automatic program synthesis. Journal of the ACM, 29:1144–1165, 1982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jain, S., Sharma, A. (1993). On aggregating teams of learning machines. In: Jantke, K.P., Kobayashi, S., Tomita, E., Yokomori, T. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 1993. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 744. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57370-4_44
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57370-4_44
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57370-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48096-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive