Abstract
It is argued that natural language syntactic differences must be used a useful cues in determining the contents of input sentences to be inserted into a knowledge base. To demonstrate how some apparently less important syntactic details might turn out to be useful, relative clauses have been analyzed in the context of conceptual graph theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brachman, R. J., H. J. Levesque, and R. Reiter. (eds) 1989. Proceedings of the first international conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann.
Guha, R.V. 1991. Contexts: a formalization and some applications. MCC Technical Report Number ACT-CYC-423-91 Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation
Sowa, John 1984. Conceptual Structures. Addison-Wesley.
Sowa, John. (ed) 1991 Principles of Semantic Networks. Morgan Kaufmann Wilensky, Robert. 1991. “Sentences, Situations, and Propositions”, in Sowa (ed) 1991 Principles of Semantic Networks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Oh, J.C., Graham, S. (1993). Does every difference make difference?. In: Pfeiffer, H.D., Nagle, T.E. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Theory and Implementation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 754. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57454-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57454-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57454-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48189-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive