Skip to main content

On self-reducible sets of low information content

Extended abstract

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 778))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 159 Accesses

Abstract

Self-reducible sets have a rich internal structure. The information contained in these sets is encoded in some redundant way. Therefore a lot of the information of the set is easily accessible. In this paper it is investigated how this self-reducibility structure of a set can be used to access easily all information contained in the set, if its information content is small. It is shown that P can be characterized as class of selfreducible sets which are “almost” in P (i.e. sets in APT′). Self-reducible sets with low instance complexity (i.e. sets in IC[log,poly]) are shown to be in NP ∩ co-NP, and sets which disjunctively reduce to sparse sets or which belong to a certain superclass of the Boolean closure of sets which conjunctively reduce to sparse sets are shown to be in PNP, if they are self-reducible in a little more restricted sense of self-reducibility.

Work done at Universität Ulm, Abt. Theoretische Informatik. Supported in part by the DAAD through Acciones Integradas 1992, 313-AI-e-es/zk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. Arvind, Y. Han, L. Hemachandra, J. Köbler, A. Lozano, M. Mundhenk, M. Ogiwara, U. Schöning, R. Silvestri, and T. Thierauf. Reductions to sets of low information content. In Complexity Theory, K. Ambos-Spies, S. Homer, and U. Schöning (eds.). Cambridge University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Arvind, J. Köbler, and M. Mundhenk. Lowness and the complexity of sparse and tally descriptions. Proc. 3rd ISAAC, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, #650:249–258, Springer Verlag, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Arvind, J. Köbler, and M. Mundhenk. Hausdorff reductions to sparse sets and to sets of high information content. Proc. 18th MFCS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, #711:232–241, Springer Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Balcázar. Self-reducibility. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 41:367–388, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.L. Balcázar, R. Book, and U. Schöming. Sparse sets, lowness and highness. SIAM Journal on Computing, 15:739–747, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.L. Balcázar, J. Díaz, and J. Gabarró. Structural Complexity I. EATCS Monographs on Theoretical Computer Science, Springer Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. Berman. Relationship between density and deterministic complexity of NP-complete languages. Proceedings of the 5th ICALP, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, #62:63–71, Springer Verlag, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Book and J. Lutz. On languages with very high space-bounded Kolmogorov complexity. SIAM Journal on Computing, 22:395–402, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Buhrman, L. Longpré, and E. Spaan. Sparse reduces conjunctively to tally. Proceedings of the 8th Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kadin. pNP[log n] and sparse Turing-complete sets for NP. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 39(3):282–298, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Karp and R. Lipton. Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes. Proceedings of the 12th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 302–309, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Ko. On self-reducibility and weak p-selectivity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 26:209–221, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Ko. Distinguishing conjunctive and disjunctive reducibilities by sparse sets. Information and Computation, 81(1):62–87, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Ko, P. Orponen, U. Schöming, and O. Watanabe. Instance complexity. Journal of the ACM, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Köbler. Locating P/poly optimally in the extended low hierarchy. Proc. of the 10th STACS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, #665:28–37, Springer Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Lozano and J. Torán. Self-reducible sets of small density. Mathematical Systems Theory, 24:83–100, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Meyer, M. Paterson. With what frequency are apparently intractable problems difficult? Tech. Report MIT/LCS/TM-126, Lab. for Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Ogiwara and O. Watanabe. On polynomial-time bounded truth-table reducibility of NP sets to sparse sets. SIAM Journal on Computing, 20(3):471–483, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. U. Schöning. A low and a high hierarchy within NP. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 27:14–28, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U. Schöning. Complexity and Structure, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, #211, Springer Verlag, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.W. Wagner. More complicated questions about maxima and minima, and some closures of NP. Theoretical Computer Science, 51:53–80, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

M. Bonuccelli P. Crescenzi R. Petreschi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mundhenk, M. (1994). On self-reducible sets of low information content. In: Bonuccelli, M., Crescenzi, P., Petreschi, R. (eds) Algorithms and Complexity. CIAC 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 778. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57811-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57811-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57811-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48337-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics