Skip to main content

Weak autoepistemic reasoning and well-founded semantics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foundations of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 810))

Abstract

The appropriateness of Autoepistemic Logic for the construction of knowledge representation systems is regarded as questionable due to its great computational complexity. Instead of resorting to incomplete interpreters, we propose a semantical characterization of approximate autoepistemic reasoning. It consists of a sequence of monotonically decreasing sets of belief states. Every autoepistemic expansion is a maximal fixpoint and is contained in the smallest fixpoint. For stratified knowledge bases the approach coincides with Autoepistemic Logic. For normal and disjunctive rules the construction can be reduced to iterated applications of a specialized consequence operator for the underlying monotonic logic. For normal rules the approximation coincides with the well-founded semantics on atomic propositions. Hence, it can be computed in quadratic time in this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chitta Baral and V. S. Subrahmanian. Dualities between alternative semantics for logic programming and nonmonotonic reasoning. In Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning, pages 69–86. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Piero A. Bonatti. Beliefs as stable conjectures. In Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Logic Programming and Non-monotonic Reasoning, pages 53–68. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Piero A. Bonatti. A family of three-valued autoepistemic logics. In E. Ardizzone, S. Gaglio, and F. Sorbello, editors, Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Proc. of the 2nd Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, pages 28–37. Springer, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 549, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Gelfond and Vladimir Lifschitz. The stable model semantics for logic programming. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. and Symp. on Logic Programming, pages 1070–1080. MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joseph Y. Halpern and Yoram Moses. Towards a theory of knowledge and ignorance: Preliminary report. In Krzysztof R. Apt, editor, Logics and Models of Concurrent Systems, pages 459–476. Springer, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tomi Janhunen. Weakened negative introspection in autoepistemic reasoning. Technical Report Series A, No. 21, Helsinki University of Technology, Digital Systems Laboratory, February 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tomi Janhunen and Ilkka Niemelä. A scheme for weakened negative introspection in autoepistemic reasoning. In Proc. of the Kurt Gödel Colloquium. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (to be published), 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jürgen Kalinski. Autoepistemic expansions with incomplete belief introspection. In J. Dix, K.P. Jantke, and P.H. Schmitt, editors, Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Nonmonotonic and Inductive Logic, pages 223–232. Springer, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 543, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. A. Kautz and B. Selman. Hard problems for simple default logics. In Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 189–197. Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Phokion G. Kolaitis. The expressive power of stratified logic programs. Information and Computation, 90:50–66, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wiktor Marek and Miroslaw Truszczyński. Autoepistemic logic. Journal of the ACM, 38(3):588–619, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jack Minker and Arcot Rajasekar. A fixpoint semantics for disjunctive logic programs. Journal of Logic Programming, 9:45–74, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Robert C. Moore. Semantical considerations on nonmonotonic logic. Artificial Intelligence, 25(4):75–94, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ilkka Niemelä. Decision procedure for autoepistemic logic. In Proc. of the 9th Conf. on Automated Deduction, pages 675–684. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 310, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ilkka Niemelä and Jussi Rintanen. On the impact of stratification on the complexity of nonmonotonic reasoning. In Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 627–638. Morgan Kaufmann, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. L. M. Pereira, J. N. Aparício, and J. J. Alferes. Non-monotonic reasoning with well founded semantics. In Proc. of the 8th Int. Conf. on Logic Programming, pages 475–489. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Teodor C. Przymusinski. Three-valued formalizations of non-monotonic reasoning and logic programming. In Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 341–348. Morgan Kaufmann, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Alfred Tarski. A lattice-theoretical fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 5:285–309, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. H. van Emden and R. A. Kowalski. The semantics of predicate logic as a programming language. Journal of the ACM, 23(4):733–742, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Van Gelder, K. A. Ross, and J. S. Schlipf. The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. Journal of the ACM, 38(3):620–650, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Allen Van Gelder. The alternating fixpoint of logic programs with negation. In Proc. of the 8th Symp. on Principles of Database Systems, pages 1–10, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gerhard Lakemeyer Bernhard Nebel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalinski, J. (1994). Weak autoepistemic reasoning and well-founded semantics. In: Lakemeyer, G., Nebel, B. (eds) Foundations of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 810. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58107-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58107-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58107-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48453-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics