Skip to main content

Preserving of admissible inference rules in modal logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logical Foundations of Computer Science (LFCS 1994)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 813))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The main result of this paper is a complete semantics description of all modal logics with finite model property that preserves all admissible for S4 inference rules: a modal logic λ with fmp above S4 preserves the admissibility iff λ has so-called co-cover property. As an application it is shown that there are continuously many logics of this kind. On base mentioned above semantical criterion, as corollary, we give some precise description of all tabular logics that preserves admissible for S4 rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clarke E.M., Grumberg O., Kurshan B.P. A Synthesis of Two Approaches for Verifying Finite State Concurrent Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 363, 1989, Logic at Botik'89, Springer-Verlag, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fagin R., Halpern J.Y., Vardi M.Y., What is an Inference Rule. J. of Symbolic Logic, 57(1992), No 3, 1018–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldblatt R.I. Metamathematics of Modal Logics, Reports on Mathematical Logic, Vol. 6(1976), 41–78 (Part 1), 7(976), 21–52 (Part 2).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Konolige K., On the Relation between Default and Autoepistemic Logic. Artificial Intelligence, V. 35 (1988), 343–382.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Larsen K.G., Thomsen B. A Modal Process Logic, in Proceedings of Third Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, Edinburgh, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moore R.G., Semantical Consideration on Non-monotonic Logic. Artificial Intelligence, V.25(1985), 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rautenberg W. Klassische und nichtklassische Aussagenlogik, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rybakov V.V. Problems of Admissibility and Substitution, Logical Equations and Restricted Theories of Free Algebras. Proced. of the 8-th International. Congress of Logic Method, and Phil, of Science. Elsevier Sci. Publ., North. Holland, Amsterdam, 1989, 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rybakov V.V. Problems of Substitution and Admissibility in the Modal System Grz and Intuitionistic Calculus. Annals of pure and applied logic V. 50, 1990, 71–106.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shvarts G.F. Gentzen Style Systems for K45 and K45D. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, No. 363, 1989, Logic at Botik'89, Springer-Verlag, 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Anil Nerode Yu. V. Matiyasevich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rybakov, V.V. (1994). Preserving of admissible inference rules in modal logic. In: Nerode, A., Matiyasevich, Y.V. (eds) Logical Foundations of Computer Science. LFCS 1994. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 813. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58140-5_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58140-5_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58140-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48442-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics