Skip to main content

Process quality problems from the point of view of the user and of the purchaser of software

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Objective Software Quality (SQ 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 926))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 155 Accesses

Abstract

The user/purchaser of software products makes investments of resources in software as one of the means for improving its own products and business.The level of improvement obtained depends, among other factors, on the quality level of the acquired software. Making reference to the relevant standard, normative and methodological documents, the paper illustrates how the quality level of the subcontracted software depends not only on the quality of the software supplier's process, but also on the quality of purchaser/user's own production/business processes. Being the purchaser/user the primary responsible of the preparation of the software requirements, which specify why the purchaser wants to invest in software, and what the software must do to improve the purchaser's products or purchaser's business process, the paper highlights the quality management activities which have to be performed by the purchaser, or monitored on the side of the supplier, in order to ensure a successful achievement of the purchaser's business goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AICQ Italia CentroNord — A. Salvini, docente — Text in support of the course on “Process Control” (Milano, October 18–19, 94)

    Google Scholar 

  2. AIPA, Autorità per l'Informatica nella Pubblica Amministrazione — Circolare 5 agosto 1994, n.AIPA/CR/5 — Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, n.191, 17-8-1994

    Google Scholar 

  3. ami (application of metrics in industry), Handbook — A quantitative approach to software development — The ami consortium, c/o The ami User Group, CSSE, South Bank University, 103 Borough Road, London SE1 OAA

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Combelles-Quantitative Approach to Software Process Improvement-Springer Verlag, Proceedings of Objective Quality 1995, The 2nd Symposium on Software Quality Techniques and Acquisition Criteria, Florence, Italy, May 29–31, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  5. Basili, V. and Weiss, D. M. — A methodology for Collecting Valid Software Engineering Data — IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  6. ESA PSS-05-0 Issue 2, February 1991 — European Space Agengy Procedures, Specifications, and Standards for Software Enginering, Issue 2

    Google Scholar 

  7. ESA PSS-05-02 — European Space Agengy, Guide to the User Requirements Definition Phase

    Google Scholar 

  8. ESA PSS-05-03 Issue 1, October 1991 — European Space Agengy, Guide to the Software Requirements Definition Phase

    Google Scholar 

  9. IEEE Std 829-1983, Standard for Software Test Documentation

    Google Scholar 

  10. IEEE Std 830-1993, Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specifications

    Google Scholar 

  11. IEEE Std 982.1-1988, Standard Dictionary of Measures to Produce Reliable Software

    Google Scholar 

  12. IEEE Std 982.2-1988, Guide for the Use of Standard Dictionary of Measures to Produce Reliable Software

    Google Scholar 

  13. IEEE Std 1044-1993, Standard Classification for Software Anomalies

    Google Scholar 

  14. ISO 8402:1994 Quality management and quality assurance — Vocabulary

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO 9000-1:1994 Quality management and quality assurance standards — Part 1: Guidelines for selection and use.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISO 9000-3:1991 Quality management and quality assurance standards — Part 3: Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001 to the development, supply and maintenance of software

    Google Scholar 

  17. ISO 9001:1994 Quality systems — Model for quality assurance in design, development, production, installation and servicing

    Google Scholar 

  18. ISO 9004-1:1994 Quality management and quality system elements — Part 1: Guidelines

    Google Scholar 

  19. ISO 9004-4:1994 Quality management and quality system elements — Part 4: Guidelines for quality improvement

    Google Scholar 

  20. ISO/IEC 9126:1991 — Information Technology — Software Product Evaluation — Quality characteristics and guidelines for their use

    Google Scholar 

  21. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) — FIPS PUB 64, Guidelines for Documentation of Computer Programs and Automated Data Systems for the Initiation Phase, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  22. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) — FIPS PUB 65, Guideline for Automatic Data Processing Risk Analysis, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nocentini, S. Il sistema di qualità del software. Il processo di pianificazione, realizzazione e controllo.-ETASLIBRI, Collana di Informatica, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paulk, M. C. and others — SEI-93-TR-024 — Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1 — Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paulk, M. C. and others — SEI-93-TR-025 — Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1 — Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  26. SCE Staff — SEI-94-TR-006 — Software Capability Evaluation, Version 2.0, Method Description — Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kang, K. C. and Christel M. G. — SEI-92-TR-012 — Issues in Requirements Elicitation — Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Higuera, R. P. and others — SEI-94-SR-001 — An introduction to Team Risk Management — Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  29. SPICE project (Software Process Improvement &Capability dEtermination) — Tutorial, at Fourth European Conference on Software Quality, October 17–20, 94, Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  30. SPICE project — Baseline Practices Guide — Version 1.00, September 1, 94 — Doc Ref BPG/TP/BPG — (Document in internal use in SPICE Project)

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Coletta —The SPICE Project: An ISO Standard for Software Process Assessment, Improvement and Capability Determination — Springer Verlag, Proceedings of Objective Quality 1995, The 2nd Symposium on Software Quality Techniques and Acquisition Criteria, Florence, Italy, May 29–31, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zultner, R. E. — Software Quality Function Deployment: Why, What, and How — Tutorial, at Fourth European Conference on Software Quality, October 17–20, 94, Basel, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Paolo Nesi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cicu, A. (1995). Process quality problems from the point of view of the user and of the purchaser of software. In: Nesi, P. (eds) Objective Software Quality. SQ 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59449-3_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59449-3_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-59449-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49268-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics