Skip to main content

Quasi-classical logic: Non-trivializable classical reasoning from inconsistent information

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty (ECSQARU 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 946))

Abstract

Here we present a new paraconsistent logic, called quasi-classical logic (or QC logic) that allows the derivation of non-trivializable classical inferences. For this it is necessary that queries are in conjunctive normal form and the reasoning process is essentially that of clause finding. We present a proof-theoretic definition, and semantics, and show that the consequence relation observes reflexivity, monotonicity and transitivity, but fails cut and supraclassicality. Finally we discuss some of the advantages of this logic, over other paraconsistent logics, for applications in information systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson A R and Belnap N D Jr. (1975) Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap N (1977) A useful four-valued logic, in Dunn J and Epstein G, Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic, 5–37, Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S, Dubois D, Prade H (1993) Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases, Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 411–419, Morgan Kaufmann

    Google Scholar 

  • Besnard Ph (1991) Paraconsistent logic approach to knowledge representation, in de Glas M, and Gabbay D, Proceedings of the First World Conference on Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence, Angkor

    Google Scholar 

  • Besnard Ph and Hunter A (1995) Properties of quasi-classical logic, Technical Report, Department of Computing, Imperial College, London

    Google Scholar 

  • da Costa N C (1974) On the theory of inconsistent formal systems, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 15, 497–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein A, Gabbay D, Hunter A, Kramer J, and Nuseibeh B (1993) Inconsistency handling in multi-perspective specifications, in IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20(8), 569–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay D and Hunter A (1991) Making inconsistency respectable, Part 1, in Jorrand Ph. and Keleman J, Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence Research, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 535, 19–32, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee R C T (1967) A completeness theorem and a computer program for finding theorems derivable from given axioms. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte K (1950) Schlussweisen-Kalkuele der Praedikatenlogik, Mathematische Annalen, 122, 47–65

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Christine Froidevaux Jürg Kohlas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Besnard, P., Hunter, A. (1995). Quasi-classical logic: Non-trivializable classical reasoning from inconsistent information. In: Froidevaux, C., Kohlas, J. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. ECSQARU 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 946. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60112-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60112-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49438-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics