Skip to main content

Relational set theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Category Theory and Computer Science (CTCS 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 953))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This article presents a relational formalization of axiomatic set theory, including so-called ZFC and the anti-foundation axiom (AFA) due to P. Aczel. The relational framework of set theory provides a general methodology for the fundamental study on computer and information sciences such as theory of graph transformation, situation semantics and analysis of knowledge dynamics in distributed systems. To demonstrate the feasibility of relational set theory some fundamental theorems of set theory, for example, Cantor-Bernstein-Schröder theorem, Cantor's theorem, Rieger's theorem and Mostowski's collapsing lemma are proved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Aczel, Non-well-founded sets, CSLI Lecture Notes No. 14, Center for the Study of Lnaguages and Information, Leland Stanford Junior University, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M.S. Calenko, The structures of correspondence categories, Soviet Math. Dokl. 18 (1977), 1498–1502.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Freyd and A. Scedrov, Categories, allegories, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Goldblatt, Topoi, The categorial analysis of logic, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.T. Johnstone, Topos theory, Academic Press, London, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Kawahara, Relations in categories with pullbacks, Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyusyu Univ. Ser. A 27 (1973), 149–173.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Kawahara, Pushout-complements and basic concepts of grammars in toposes, Theoretical Computer Science 77(3) (1990), 267–289.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Kawahara and Y. Mizoguchi, Categorical assertion semantics in toposes, Advances in Software Science and Technology, 4(1992), 137–150.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Kawahara and Y. Mizoguchi, Relational structures and their partial morphisms in the view of single pushout rewriting, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 776 (1994), 218–233.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Kelly, A note on relations relative to a factorization system, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1488 (1991), 249–261.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Mac Lane, An algebra of additive relations, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 47(1961), 1043–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Mac Lane, Homology, (Springer-Verlag, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Mac Lane, Categories for the working mathematician, (Springer-Verlag, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.D. Maddux, The origin of relation algebras in the developement and axiomatization of the calculus of relations, Studia Logica, 50 (1991), 423–455.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Puppe, Korrespondenzen in Abelschen Kategorien, Math. Ann. 148 (1962), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Schmidt and T. Ströhlein, Relations and graphs, (Springer-Verlag, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Pitt David E. Rydeheard Peter Johnstone

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kawahara, Y. (1995). Relational set theory. In: Pitt, D., Rydeheard, D.E., Johnstone, P. (eds) Category Theory and Computer Science. CTCS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 953. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60164-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60164-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60164-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44661-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics