Skip to main content

Decomposing typed lambda calculus into a couple of categorical programming languages

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Category Theory and Computer Science (CTCS 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 953))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We give two categorical programming languages with variable arrows and associated abstraction/reduction mechanisms, which extend the possibility of categorical programming [Hag87, CF92] in practice. These languages are complementary to each other — one of them provides a first-order programming style whereas the other does higher-order — and are “children” of the simply typed lambda calculus in the sense that we can decompose typed lambda calculus into them and, conversely, the combination of them is equivalent to typed lambda calculus. This decomposition is a consequence of a semantic analysis on typed lambda calculus due to C. Hermida and B. Jacobs [HJ94].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Abadi, L. Cardelli, P.-L. Curien and J.-J. Levy, Explicit substitutions. Journal of Functional Programming 1 (4), pages 375–416, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. R. B. Cockett and T. Fukushima, About Charity. Technical Report 92/480/18, University of Calgary, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. R. B. Cockett and D. Spencer, Strong categorical datatypes I. In Canadian Mathematical Society Proceedings, Category Theory 1991, Montreal, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. Cousineau, P.-L. Curien and M. Mauny, The categorical abstract machine. Science of Computer Programming 8, pages 173–202, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.-L. Curien, α-conversion,conditions on variables and categorical logic. Studia Logica XLVIII (3), pages 55–91, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Felleisen, D. P. Friedman, E. Kohlbecker and B. Duba, A syntactic theory of sequential control. Theoretical Computer Science 52, pages 205–237, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Goguen, Higher order functions considered unnecessary for higher order programming. In D. Turner (ed.): Research Topics in Functional Programming, University of Texas at Austin Year of Programming Series, pages 309–352, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Hagino, A categorical programming language. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Hasegawa, Contextual calculus, cartesian category and categorical data types. Master's thesis, RIMS, Kyoto University, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Hermida and B. Jacobs, Fibrations with indeterminates: contextual and functional completeness for polymorphic lambda calculi. 1994. To appear in Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Hofmann, Sound and complete axiomatisations of call-by-value control. Manuscript, LFCS, University of Edinburgh, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Jacobs, Simply typed and untyped Lambda Calculus revisited. In M. P. Fourman et al. (eds.): Applications of Categories in Computer Science, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 177, pages 119–142, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Jacobs, Parameters and parametrization in specification, using distributive categories. 1993. To appear in Fundamenta Infomaticae.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Lafont, Linear abstract machine. Theoretical Computer Science 59, pages 157–180, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Lambek, Functional completeness of cartesian categories. Annals of Mathematical Logic 6, pages 259–292, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Lambek and P. J. Scott, Introduction to higher order categorical logic. Cambridge University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Phoa, An introduction to fibrations, topos theory, the effective topos and modest sets. Technical Report ECS-LFCS-92-208, University of Edinburgh, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Rees and W. Clinger, The revised report on the algorithmic language Scheme. SIGPLAN Notices 21(12), pages 37–79, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David Pitt David E. Rydeheard Peter Johnstone

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hasegawa, M. (1995). Decomposing typed lambda calculus into a couple of categorical programming languages. In: Pitt, D., Rydeheard, D.E., Johnstone, P. (eds) Category Theory and Computer Science. CTCS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 953. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60164-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60164-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60164-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44661-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics