Skip to main content

Qualitative spatial reasoning using algebraic topology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS (COSIT 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 988))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Many propositions in spatial and qualitative reasoning can be modelled as regions in phase or configuration spaces. Deciding the consistency of k propositions then amounts to deciding the question of whether there exists a point which simultaneously falls into all k corresponding regions. A more difficult problem is to decide whether there is a point which falls only within the given k regions. I call this feasibility of the set of propositions.

In this paper, I present a method for deciding consistency and feasibility for convex regions using only topological inference. It uses Helly's theorem to decide consistency of any set of k propositions based on information about consistency of small subsets. Using methods of algebraic topology, I show a sufficient method to compute a minimal skeleton of feasible places which accurately models the connectivity between feasible environments.

The method has been implemented. I show how to formulate and solve the piano-movers problem, an important problem in spatial reasoning, using the framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Chvátal: “Linear Programming,” W. H. Freeman, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.A. Randell, A.G. Cohn, Z. Cui: “Naive topology: Modellling the force pump,” in P. Struss, B. Faltings (eds.): Recent Advances in Qualitative Physics, MIT Press, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z. Cui, A.G. Cohn, D.A. Randell: “Qualitative Simulation Based on a Logical Formalism of Space and Time,” Proceedings of the 10th National Conference of the AAAI, AAAI Press, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.J. Egenhofer: “Reasoning about binary topological relations,” in O. Gunther, H.J. Schek(eds.): Advances in Spatial Databases, pp. 143–160, Springer-Verlag, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.D. Hoffman, W.A. Richards: “Parts of Recognition,” Cognition18, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Lozano-Perez, M. Wesley: “An Algorithm for Planning Collision-Free Paths Among Polyhedral Obstacles,” Comm. of the ACM, 22, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Spanier: “Algebraic Topology”, Mc. Graw Hill, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.T. Schwartz, C.K. Yap: Advances in Robotics, Vol. 1: Algorithmic and Geometric Aspects of Robotics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1987

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Zhao: “Phase Space Navigator: Towards Automating Control Synthesis in Phase Spaces for Nonlinear Control Systems,” Proceedings of the 3rd IFAC International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Real Time Control, Pergamon Press, 1991

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Andrew U. Frank Werner Kuhn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Faltings, B. (1995). Qualitative spatial reasoning using algebraic topology. In: Frank, A.U., Kuhn, W. (eds) Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 988. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60392-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45519-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics