Skip to main content

Proximity operators for qualitative spatial reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS (COSIT 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 988))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One way to increase the power of Qualitative Spatial Reasoning is to introduce proximity operators (such as close and far) that are surrogates for distance measures. These operators appear to be semi-quantitative in nature as opposed to purely qualitative. In the light of observations drawn from psychometric testing of perceived proximity, this paper discusses how a model to support proximal reasoning could be constructed. The relationships between the model and the raw data are described. Fuzzy set membership is used to reason about the degree of closeness. The formulation of queries involving proximity is presented, with the meaning of linguistic variables being instantiated within a given context at execution time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cressie N A C (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley and Sons, USA, Ch. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S (1990), Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: A Semi-Quantitative Approach Using Fuzzy Logic. In: Design and Implementation of Large Spatial Databases (Eds. Buchmann A, Günther O, Smith T R and Wang Y-F) Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer M J and Franzosa R D (1991), Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. Int. J. Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank A U (1992), Qualitative Spatial Reasoning about Distances and Directions in Geographic Space. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, Vol. 3, pp 343–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahegan M N (1994), Support for the Contextual Interpretation of Data Within an Object-Oriented GIS. Proc. Spatial Data Handling '94, (Ed. Waugh T C and Healey R G), pp 988–1001, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gapp K-P (1994), A Computational Model of the Basic Meanings of Graded Composite Spatial Relations in 3D Space. Proc. Int. Workshop on Advanced Geographic Data Modelling (AGDM '94), (Ed. M Molenaar and S De Hoop), pp 66–79, Delft, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman L (1968), A General Nonmetric Technique for Finding the Smallest Coordinate Space for a Configuration of Points. Psychometrika, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp 469–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg U and Ekman G (1973), Subjective Geographic Distance: A Multidimensional Comparison. Psychometrika, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar M (1994), A Syntactic Approach for Handling the Semantics of Fuzzy Spatial Objects. Proc. European Science Foundation, GISDATA, Baden, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson D E (1994), Generalization of Spatial and Thematic Data Using Inheritance and Classification and Aggregation Hierarchies. Proc. Spatial Data Handling '94, (Ed. Waugh T C and Healey R G), pp 957–972, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S A, Gahegan M N, Hogg J and Hoyle B S, (1991), Application of Object-Oriented Databases to Geographic Information Systems. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S A and Gahegan M N, (1991), Supporting the Notion of Context Within a Database Environment for Intelligent Reporting and Query Optimisation. European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 1, no 1, pp 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson V B (1990), Interactive Machine Acquisition of a Fuzzy Spatial Relation. Computers and Geosciences, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp 857–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma J, Flewelling D M and Egenhofer M J (1994), A Qualitative Spatial Reasoner. Proc. Spatial Data Handling '94, (Ed. Waugh T C and Healey R G), pp 665–681, Edinburgh, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith T R and Park K K (1992), Algebraic Approach to Spatial Reasoning. Int. J. Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worboys M F, Hearnshaw H M, Maguire D J (1991), Object-Oriented Data and Query Modelling for Geographical Information Systems. Proc. 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, (Ed. Brassel K & Kishimoto H), Dept. of Geography, University of Zurich, Switzerland, Vol. 2, pp 679–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L A (1975), The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning. Information Sciences, Vol. 8 pp 199–249 (part I), Vol. 8 pp 301–357 (part II), Vol. 9 pp 43–80 (part III).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann H J and Zysno P (1980), Latent Connectives in Human Decision Making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 4, pp 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Andrew U. Frank Werner Kuhn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gahegan, M. (1995). Proximity operators for qualitative spatial reasoning. In: Frank, A.U., Kuhn, W. (eds) Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 988. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60392-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45519-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics