Abstract
Human-subjects testing based on a sound formal model is outlined as an effective way to evaluate and refine computational models of spatial relations. The cognitive response of a subject (person) to a real-world situation depends on the characteristic of the situation and the characteristics of the subject. Spatial entities can be characterized by topological relations, metric, scale (scope), kinds of phenomena (semantics), motion (time), and (for maps and displays) graphic presentation. Subjects' responses may vary according to their natural languages, their cultures, and individual characteristics such as gender, age, and handedness. Given this conceptual background, seven human-subjects testing protocols are introduced. Each test is described, and results of applications of these tests are summarized where possible. The tests are compared with their requirements, and the different aspects of human spatial cognition that they might test. Lastly, a program for applying these tests and refining the formal models based on test results is presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abrahamson, F., 1994. Uklarhet og Noyaktighet i Geografiske Informasjonssystemer (Fuzziness and Accuracy in Geographical Information Systems), Unpublished Master's thesis, Division of Surveying and Mapping, University of Trondheim (Norway) and Norwegian Institute of Technology.
Bowerman, M., 1991. The Origins of Children's Spatial Semantic Categories: Cognitive vs. Linguistic Determinants. In J. J. Gumperz and S. C. Levinson, Editors, Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burrough, P., and Frank, A. U., (Editors) 1995. Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. London, Taylor and Francis, in press.
Cohn, A. G., and Gotts, N. M., 1995. The “Egg-Yolk” Representation of Regions with Indeterminate Boundaries. In P. Burrough and A. U. Frank, Editors, Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. London, Taylor and Francis, in press.
Cohn, A. G., Randell, D. A., and Cui, Z., 1994. Taxonomies of Logically Defined Qualitative Spatial Relations. In N. Guarino and R. Poli, Editors, Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation. Kluwer, in press.
Egenhofer, M., and Franzosa, R., 1991. Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(2): 161–174.
Egenhofer, M., and Franzosa, R., 1995. On the Equivalence of Topological Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9(2): 133–152.
Egenhofer, M., and Herring, J., 1994. Categorizing Topological Spatial Relations Between Point, Line, and Area Objects. In M. J. Egenhofer, D. M. Mark, and J. R. Herring, 1994. The 9-Intersection: Formalism and its Use For Natural-Language Spatial Predicates. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Report 94-1.
Egenhofer, M. J., and Mark, D. M., 1995. Modeling Conceptual Neighborhoods of Topological Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, in press.
Egenhofer, M. J., Mark, D. M., and Herring, J. R. 1994. The 9-Intersection: Formalism and its Use For Natural-Language Spatial Predicates. Santa Barbara, CA: National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Report 94-1.
Frank, A. U., 1995. The Prevalence of Objects with Sharp Boundaries in GIS. In P. Burrough and A. U. Frank, Editors, Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. London, Taylor and Francis, in press.
Halpern, D. F., 1986. Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum Associates.
Herskovits, A., 1986. Language and Spatial Cognition: A Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Howard, M. C., 1989. Contemporary Cultural Anthropology (Third Edition). Harper Collins Publishers.
Mark, D. M., 1993. Toward a Theoretical Framework for Geographic Entity Types. In A. U. Frank and I. Campari, Editors, Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences Vol. 716, pp. 270–283.
Mark, D. M., and Egenhofer, M. J., 1994a. Calibrating the Meanings of Spatial Predicates From Natural Language: Line-Region Relations. Sixth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling 1994, Vol. 1, pp. 538–553.
Mark, D. M., and Egenhofer, M. J., 1994b. Modeling Spatial Relations Between Lines and Regions: Combining Formal Mathematical Models and Human Subjects Testing. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 21(3), in press.
Mark, D. M., and Egenhofer, M. J., 1995. Topology of Prototypical Spatial Relations Between Lines and Regions in English and Spanish. AutoCarto 12, Charlotte, NC, March 1995, pp. 245–254.
Mark, D. M., and Freundschuh, S. M., 1995. Spatial Concepts and Cognitive Models for Geographic Information Use. In T. L. Nyerges, D. M. Mark, R. Laurini, and M. Egenhofer, Editors, Cognitive Aspects of Human-Computer Interaction for Geographic Information Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Montello, D., 1995. Cultural Differences in Spatial Cognition? COSIT'95, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, in press.
Randell, D. A., Cohn, A. G., and Cui, Z., 1992. A Spatial Logic Based on Regions and Connection. 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 156–176.
Wagner, L., 1993. The Mental Representation of the Meaning of Across. Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis, Wellesley College.
Talmy, L., 1983. How Language Structures Space. In H. Pick and L. Acredolo, Editors, Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application. Plenum Press.
Whorf, B. L., 1940. Science and Linguistics. Technology Review (M.I.T.) 42(6). reprinted in J. B. Carroll, Editor, 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press, pp. 207–219.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mark, D.M., Comas, D., Egenhofer, M.J., Freundschuh, S.M., Gould, M.D., Nunes, J. (1995). Evaluating and refining computational models of spatial relations through cross-linguistic human-subjects testing. In: Frank, A.U., Kuhn, W. (eds) Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 988. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60392-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45519-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive