Skip to main content

Terminological meta-reasoning by reification and multiple contexts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 990))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce a model and a system architecture for second-order reasoning about statements expressed in a (first-order) terminological representation language. This meta-reasoning approach is based on the reification of first-order propositions and the mediation between second- and first-order expressions via translation rules operating on multiple contexts. An application to a concept learning task in a text understanding environment shows how different degrees of credibility can be assigned to alternative concept hypotheses on the basis of such a schema for terminological meta-reasoning.

This work was supported by a grant from DFG under the account Ha2097/2-1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiello, L. and Levi, G. (1988). The uses of metaknowledge in AI systems. In P.Maes and D.Nardi, editors, Meta-Level Architectures and Reflection, pages 243–254. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buvač, S., Buvač, V., and Mason, I. (1995). Metamathematics of contexts. Fundamenta Informaticae, 23(3). Also distributed via <http://sail.stanford. edu/buvac/metamathematics-of-context.ps>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buvač, S. and McCarthy, J. (1994). More notes on formalizing context. Distributed via <http://sail.stanford.edu/buvac/more-notes-on-formalizingcontext.ps>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buvač, S.; Buvač, V. and Mason, I. (1994). The semantics of propositional contexts. In Proc. 8th Intl. Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. Springer. Also distributed via <http://sail.stanford.edu/buvac/semantics-of-propositional-contexts.ps>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. (1988). Representing arguments as background knowledge for constraining generalisation. In EWSL'88 — Proc. 3rd European Working Session on Learning, pages 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, P. (1985). Heuristic Reasoning about Uncertainty: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Los Altos/CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. and Hirsh, H. (1994). The learnability of description logics with equality constraints. Machine Learning, 17:169–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. (1979). A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence, 12:231–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. and Wand, M. (1984). Reification: reflection without metaphysics. In Proc. 1984 ACM Symposium on Lisp and Functional Programming, pages 348–355, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giunchiglia, F. and Serafini, L. (1994). Multilanguage hierarchical logics, or: how can we do without modal logics? Artificial Intelligence, 65:29–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U., Klenner, M., and Schnattinger, K. (1995). Learning from texts — A terminological meta-reasoning perspective. In Proc. IJCAI'95 Workshop on New Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing. Also distributed via <http://www.coling.uni-freiburg.de/public/papers/ijcai95.ps>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, U., Schacht, S., and Bröker, N. (1994). Concurrent, object-oriented dependency parsing — the ParseTalk model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 41(1/2):179–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, J. and Moses, Y. (1992). A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief. Artificial Intelligence, 54:319–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief. An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kietz, J.-U. and Morik, K. (1994). A polynomial approach to the constructive induction of structural knowledge. Machine Learning, 14:193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, R. (1993). Representing reified relations in LOOM. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 5:179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, R. (1994). A description classifier for the predicate calculus. In AAAI'94 — Proc. 12th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 213–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1993). Notes on formalizing context. In IJCAI'93 — Proc. 13th Intl. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 555–560, Chambery, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morik, K. (1986). Anything you can do I can do meta. Technical Report KIT-Report 40, TU Berlin, FB Informatik, Projektgruppe KIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, D. (1988). Evaluation and reflection in FOL. In P.Maes and D.Nardi, editors, Meta-Level Architectures and Reflection, pages 61–74. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombe, L. (1990). Reasoning Under Incomplete Information in Artificial Intelligence: A Comparison of Formalisms Using a Single Example. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyhrauch, R. W. (1980). Prolegomena to a theory of mechanized formal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13(1):133–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Carlos Pinto-Ferreira Nuno J. Mamede

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schnattinger, K., Hahn, U., Klenner, M. (1995). Terminological meta-reasoning by reification and multiple contexts. In: Pinto-Ferreira, C., Mamede, N.J. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 990. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60428-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60428-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60428-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45595-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics