Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A rationale for automated configuration status accounting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Configuration Management (SCM 1993, SCM 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1005))

  • 161 Accesses

Abstract

Configuration status accounting has been traditionally considered to perform the recording and reporting tasks within CM. We discuss the motivations for extending it with support for project control activities, and lay down requirements for integrating it with a software engineering environment that provides mechanisms for process integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckley, F.J., Implementing Configuration Management. IEEE PRESS / IEEE Computer Society Press. New York, NY 1993. 249 p.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dart, S.A., The Past, Present, and Future of CM. Technical report CMU/SEI-92-TR-8. Software Engineering Institute. Pittsburgh, PA 1992. 28 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Falkenberg, B., Configuration Management for a Large (SW) Development. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Configuration Management. Princeton, NJ 24.10.1989. Software Engineering Notes 17(1989)7, p. 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feiler, P.H., Configuration Management Models in Commercial Environments. Technical report CMU/SEI-91-TR-7. Software Engineering Institute. Pittsburgh PA 1991. 54 p.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Forte, G., In Search of the Integrated Environment. CASE Outlook 3(1989)2, p. 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lacroix, M. and Lavency, P., The Change Request Process. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Software Configuration Management. Princeton, NJ 24.10.1989. Software Engineering Notes 17(1989)7, p. 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laine A. and Viskari J., UISER — a Customizable Software Engineering Environment for Development-in-the-Large. Proceedings of Euromicro 92. Paris 14.-17.9.1992. Microprocessing and Microprogramming 35(1992)1–5, p. 505–512.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lehman, M.M., Software Engineering, the Software Process and Their Support. Software Engineering Journal 6(1991)5, p. 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mi, P. and Scacchi, W., Process Integration in CASE Environments. IEEE Software 9(1992)2, p. 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sprague, K., The Role of Software Configuration Management in a Measurement-Based Software Engineering Program. ACM SIGSOFT Engineering Notes 16(1991)2, p. 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Terry, B. and Logee, D., Terminology for Software Engineering Environment (SEE) and Computer-Aided Software Engineering (CASE). ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 15(1990)2, p. 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KONE Elevators, P.O.Box 677, 05801, Hyvinkää, Finland

    Juha Viskari

Authors
  1. Juha Viskari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Jacky Estublier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Viskari, J. (1995). A rationale for automated configuration status accounting. In: Estublier, J. (eds) Software Configuration Management. SCM SCM 1993 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60578-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60578-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-60578-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47768-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics