Skip to main content

Ariadne and HOPLa: Flexible coordination of collaborative processes

  • Regular Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination Languages and Models (COORDINATION 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1061))

Included in the following conference series:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Ait-Kaci, “Type Subsumption as a Model of Computation”, in Proc. of the 1st International Workshop on Expert Database Systems, L. Kerschberg (Ed.), 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sergio Bandinelli and Alfonso Fuggetta, “Computational Reflection in Software Process Modelling: the SLANG approach,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Timo Besamusca, “Defining a Coordination Language for Hybrid Office Processes,” Master's thesis, University of Utrecht, Dept. of Computer Science, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benno Boerboom, “Primitiva voor het modelleren van samenwerkingsprocessen,” Master's thesis, University of Utrecht, Dept. of Computer Science, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholas Carriero and David Gelernter, “Coordination Languages and Their Significance,” Comm of the ACM, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 96–107, February 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jeff Conklin and Michael L. Begeman, “gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion,” Technical Report STP-082-88, MCC, Software Technology Program, March 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.A. Ellis, S.J. Gibbs, and G.L. Rein, “Groupware: Some Issues and Experiences,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, no. 1, January 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.A. Ellis and J. Wainier, “A Conceptual Model of Groupware,” in Proceedings CSCW'94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fernando Flores, Michael Graves, Brad Hartfield, and Terry Winograd, “Computer Systems and the Design of Organizational Interaction,” ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 153–172, April 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Gulla and O. Lindland, “Modelling Cooperative Work for Workflow Management,” in Proceedings CAiSE 94, G. Wijers et. al. (Eds.), Utrecht, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Greefhorst, “A Simulation Environment for Ariadne,” Master's thesis, Utrecht University, Dept. of Computer Science, too appear, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heikki Hämmäinen, et. al., “Distributed Form Management,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 50–76, January 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dennis Heimbigner and Marc Kellner, Software Process Example for ISPW-7, Anon. FTP from ftp.cs.colorado.edu, /pub/cs/techreports/ISPW7/ispw7.ex.ps, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simon M. Kaplan, et.al., “Flexible, Active Support for Collaborative Work with Conversation Builder,” in CSCW'92 — Proceedings of the ACM 1992 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, 1992, pp. 378–385.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Karbe and N. Ramsperger, “Influence of Exception Handling on the Support of Cooperative Office Work,” in Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.4 Conference on Multi-User Interfaces and Applications, Simon Gibbs and Alex A. Verrijn-Stuart (Eds.), Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gail E. Kaiser, Steven S. Popovich, and Israel Z. Ben-Shaul, “A Bi-Level Language for Software Process Modelling,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Software Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas Kreifelts, et.al., “Experiences with the DOMINO Office Procedure System,” in Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, L. Bannon, M. Robinson, and K. Schmidt (Eds.), Amsterdam, the Netherlands, September 1991, pp. 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thomas W. Malone and Kevin Crowston, “What is Coordination Theory and How Can It Help Design Cooperative Work Systems,” in CSCW'90 — Proceedings of the 1990 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Los Angeles, California, October 1990, pp. 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas W. Malone, Kum-Yew Lai, and Christopher Fry, “Experiments with Oval: A Radically Tailorable Tool for Cooperative Work,” in CSCW'92 — Proceedings of the ACM 1992 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Toronto, Canada, November 1992, pp. 289–297.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Frank von Martial, “A Conversation Model for Resolving Conflicts among Distributed Office Activities,” in Proceedings of the 1990 Conference on Office Information Systems, F. Lochovsky and R. Allen (Eds.), 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steven Pemberton and Lon Barfield, “The MUSA Design Methodology,” Technical Report 91/12, Software Engineering Research Centre, December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lucy Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Paolo Ciancarini Chris Hankin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Florijn, G., Besamusca, T., Greefhorst, D. (1996). Ariadne and HOPLa: Flexible coordination of collaborative processes. In: Ciancarini, P., Hankin, C. (eds) Coordination Languages and Models. COORDINATION 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1061. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61052-9_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61052-9_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61052-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49936-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics