Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Aarnio, A. 1987 The Rational as Reasonable. A Treatise on Legal Justification. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Alexy, R. 1989 A theory of legal Argumentation. The theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon press.
Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst 1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Berlin/New York: Foris/De Gruyter.
Eemeren, F.H. van (et al.) 1991 Argumenteren voor juristen. Het analyseren en schrijven van juridische teksten en beleidsteksten. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst 1992 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Feteris, E.T. 1992 ‘Discussies in an juridisch proces: an pragma-dialectisch perspectief'. Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing, 14, pp. 44–54.
Franken, H. 1982 ‘Van rechtspleging tot rechtsbescherming'. RM Themis, 5/6, pp. 450–461.
Franken, H. (et al.) 1995 Inleiden tot de rechtswetenschap. Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 7th. ed.
MacCormick, D.N. 1978 Legal reasoning and legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacCormick, D.N. en R.S. Summers, 1991 ‘Interpretation and Justification'. In: MacCormick, D.N. & R.S. Summers, (eds.) Interpreting Statutes. A comparative study. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 511–545.
Plug, H.J. 1994 ‘Reconstructing complex argumentation in judicial decisions'. In: F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (eds.), Studies in Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 246–254, Ch. 22.
Plug, H.J. 1995 ‘The rational reconstruction of additional considerations in judicial decisions'. In: F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst et al. (eds.), Special Fields and Cases. Proc. of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam: Sic Sat pp. 61–73.
Snoeck Henkemans, A.F., 1992 Analysing complex argumentation. The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. Sicsat, Amsterdam, ‘Dissertation Amsterdam'.
Summers, R.S. en M. Taruffo, 1991 ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis'. In: MacCormick, D.N. & R.S. Summers, (eds.) Interpreting Statutes. A comparative study. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 461–510.
Veegens, D.J. 1989 Cassatie in burgerlijke zaken. (3rd. ed. revised by E. Korthals Altes & H.A. Groen). Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Plug, J. (1996). Complex argumentation in judicial decisions. Analysing conflicting arguments. In: Gabbay, D.M., Ohlbach, H.J. (eds) Practical Reasoning. FAPR 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1085. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_94
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_94
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61313-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68454-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive