Skip to main content

Complex argumentation in judicial decisions. Analysing conflicting arguments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Practical Reasoning (FAPR 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1085))

Included in the following conference series:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Aarnio, A. 1987 The Rational as Reasonable. A Treatise on Legal Justification. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexy, R. 1989 A theory of legal Argumentation. The theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification. Oxford: Clarendon press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst 1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Berlin/New York: Foris/De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F.H. van (et al.) 1991 Argumenteren voor juristen. Het analyseren en schrijven van juridische teksten en beleidsteksten. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F.H. van & R. Grootendorst 1992 Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feteris, E.T. 1992 ‘Discussies in an juridisch proces: an pragma-dialectisch perspectief'. Tijdschrift voor taalbeheersing, 14, pp. 44–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franken, H. 1982 ‘Van rechtspleging tot rechtsbescherming'. RM Themis, 5/6, pp. 450–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franken, H. (et al.) 1995 Inleiden tot de rechtswetenschap. Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 7th. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, D.N. 1978 Legal reasoning and legal theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, D.N. en R.S. Summers, 1991 ‘Interpretation and Justification'. In: MacCormick, D.N. & R.S. Summers, (eds.) Interpreting Statutes. A comparative study. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 511–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plug, H.J. 1994 ‘Reconstructing complex argumentation in judicial decisions'. In: F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (eds.), Studies in Pragma-Dialectics, Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 246–254, Ch. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plug, H.J. 1995 ‘The rational reconstruction of additional considerations in judicial decisions'. In: F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst et al. (eds.), Special Fields and Cases. Proc. of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam: Sic Sat pp. 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeck Henkemans, A.F., 1992 Analysing complex argumentation. The reconstruction of multiple and coordinatively compound argumentation in a critical discussion. Sicsat, Amsterdam, ‘Dissertation Amsterdam'.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R.S. en M. Taruffo, 1991 ‘Interpretation and Comparative Analysis'. In: MacCormick, D.N. & R.S. Summers, (eds.) Interpreting Statutes. A comparative study. Dartmouth: Aldershot, pp. 461–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veegens, D.J. 1989 Cassatie in burgerlijke zaken. (3rd. ed. revised by E. Korthals Altes & H.A. Groen). Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Dov M. Gabbay Hans Jürgen Ohlbach

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Plug, J. (1996). Complex argumentation in judicial decisions. Analysing conflicting arguments. In: Gabbay, D.M., Ohlbach, H.J. (eds) Practical Reasoning. FAPR 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1085. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_94

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_94

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61313-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68454-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics