Skip to main content

Defeasible constraint solving

  • Constraint Logic Programming
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Over-Constrained Systems (OCS 1995)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1106))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Hierarchical Constraint Solving has been proposed as an adequate scheme to specify over-constrained problems where some of the constraints might remain unsatisfied. However it is often not clear which criteria should be adopted to select the “best” combination of constraints to be relaxed. In previous work we proposed IHCS — an Incremental Hierarchical Constraint Solver — but only with a single criterium. This paper presents IHCS as a general scheme to incrementally handle a hierarchy of constraints for a class of comparators using different criteria. The scheme is further extended with a satisfaction mode — given a threshold, this mode enables the search of “satisfactory” solutions to large problems whose optimization is not possible in acceptable time. This scheme can be integrated with different programming environments. In particular, we have integrated it with Prolog to produce an instance of an HCLP language. Because of its portability and incremental nature, IHCS is well suited for reactive systems, allowing the interactive introduction and removal of preferred constraints, illustrated in the examples presented in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Borning, M. Maher, A. Martingale, and M. Wilson. Constraints hierarchies and logic programming. Logic Programming: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, pages 149–164, Lisbon, Portugal, June 1989. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Codognet, P. Codognet, and G. Filé. Yet Another Intelligent Backtracking Method. In Proceedings of 5th ICLP/SLP, Seattle, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Davis and W. Hamscher. Model-based Reasoning: Troubleshooting. Exploring Artificial Intelligence, chapter 8, pages 297–379. Morgan Kaufmann Publisher, INC., 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. de Kleer. Problem Solving with the ATMS. Artificial Intelligence, 28:197–224, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Doyle. A Truth Maintenance System. Artificial Intelligence, 12:231–272, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Michael R. Garey and David S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completness. W.H.Freeman and Company, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. U. Junker. Generating Diagnoses by Prioritized Defaults. In Working Notes of 2nd International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, Milano, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vipin Kumar. Algorithms for Constraint-Satisfaction-Problems: A Survey. AI Magazine, pages 32–44, Spring 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alan K. Mackworth. Consistency in Networks of Relations. Artificial Intelligence, 8:99–118, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alan K. Mackworth and Eugene C. Freuder. The Complexity of Some Polynomial Network Consistency Algorithms for Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Artificial Intelligence, 25:65–74, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Menezes and P. Barahona. Preliminary Formalization of an Incremental Hierarchical Constraint Solver. In Proceedings of EPIA '93, Porto, October 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Menezes and P. Barahona. An Incremental Hierarchical Constraint Solver. Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. M. Pereira, C. Damásio, and J. J. Alferes. Diagnosis and Debugging as Contradiction Removal. 2nd Int. Ws. on Logic Programming and NonMonotonic Reasoning, pages 316–330. MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Luis Moniz Pereira and M. Bruynooghe. Deduction Revision by Intelligent Backtracking. Implementations of Prolog, pages 194–215. J.A. Campbell, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Poole. A Logical Framework for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 36:27–47, 1988.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Simonis. Test Generation using the Constraint Logic Programming Language CHIP. Logic Programming: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, pages 101–112, Lisbon, Portugal, June 1989. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Van Hentenryck, Y. Deville, and C.-M. Teng. A Generic Arc Consistency Algorithm and its Specializations. Technical Report RR 91-22, K.U. Leuven, F.S.A., December 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Michael Jampel Eugene Freuder Michael Maher

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Menezes, F., Barahona, P. (1996). Defeasible constraint solving. In: Jampel, M., Freuder, E., Maher, M. (eds) Over-Constrained Systems. OCS 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1106. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61479-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61479-6_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61479-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68601-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics