Skip to main content

Tableaux and algorithms for Propositional Dynamic Logic with Converse

  • Session 8B
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Deduction — Cade-13 (CADE 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1104))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a prefixed tableaux calculus for Propositional Dynamic Logic with Converse based on a combination of different techniques such as prefixed tableaux for modal logics and model checkers for mu-calculus. We prove the correctness and completeness of the calculus and illustrate its features. We also discuss the transformation of the tableaux method (naively NEXPTIME) into an EXPTIME algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. P. Blackburn and E. Spaan. A modal perspective on computational complexity of attribute value grammar. J. of Logic, Language and Information, 2:129–169, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. De Giacomo. Decidability of class-based knowledge representation formalisms. PhD thesis, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. De Giacomo and M. Lenzerini. Boosting the correspondence between description logics and propositional dynamic logics. In Proc. of AAAI-94, pages 205–212, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. J. Fisher and R. E. Ladner. Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. J. of Computer and System Sciences, 18:194–211, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Fitting. Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics. Reidel, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Friedman and J. Halpern. On the complexity of conditional logics. In Proc. of KR-94, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. M. Gabbay. Labelled deductive systems. Tech. Rep. MPI-I-94-223, Max Plank Inst. für Informatik, Saarbrüken, Germany, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Goré. Tableaux method for modal and temporal logics. Tech. Rep. TR-ARP-15-5, Australian National University, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Halpern and Y. Moses. A guide to completeness and complexity for modal logics of knowledge and belief. Artificial Intelligence, 54:319–379, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Kozen and J. Tiuryn. Logics of programs. In Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, pages 790–840. Elsevier, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Massacci. Strongly analytic tableaux for normal modal logics. In Proc. of CADE-94, LNAI 814, pages 723–737. Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. R. Pratt. A practical decision method for propositional dynamic logic. In Proc. of STOC-78, pages 326–337, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. R. Pratt. Models of program logics. In Proc. of FOCS-79, pages 115–122, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. R. Pratt. A near-optimal method for reasoning about action. J. of Computer and System Sciences, 20:231–255, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Schild. A correspondence theory for terminological logics: Preliminary report. In Proc. of IJCAI-91, pages 466–471, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Stirling. Modal and temporal logic. In Handbook of Logic in Computer Science, pages 477–563. Clarendon Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Stirling and D. Walker. Local model checking in modal mu-calculus. Theoretical Computer Science, 89:161–177, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Van Benthem, J. Van Eijck, and V. Stebletsova. Modal logic, transition systems and processes. J. of Logic and Computation, 4(5):811–855, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Y. Vardi and P. Wolper. Automata-theoretic techniques for modal logics of programs. J. of Computer and System Sciences, 32:183–221, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. W. A. Woods and J. G. Schmolze. The KL-ONE family. In Semantic Networks in Artificial Intelligence, pages 133–178. Pergamon Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

M. A. McRobbie J. K. Slaney

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Giacomo, G., Massacci, F. (1996). Tableaux and algorithms for Propositional Dynamic Logic with Converse. In: McRobbie, M.A., Slaney, J.K. (eds) Automated Deduction — Cade-13. CADE 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1104. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61511-3_117

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61511-3_117

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61511-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68687-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics