Skip to main content

A modal action logic based framework for organization specification and analysis

  • Applications
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1126))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper proposes a logic-oriented framework for the specification and analysis of organizations. Within this framework, an organization is seen as a multi-agent society where each agent has some “capabilities” and where agents interact according to some forms of “institutionalized power relations”. Modal action logics, of the type developed in the Philosophy area, are used to reason about agent's agency and interaction.

In spite of its simplicity (and limitations), the proposed framework allows us to deal, at an appropriate level of abstraction, with some fundamental issues in an organization, like the responsibility for some task, task decomposition, etc. Moreover, it can be used to support the automation of some aspects of the organization's activity and interaction with external users, being already possible to use a workbench to answer questions like “can agent x ensure task A?”, “what should x do to obtain task A?”, and “to whom should a user go (in e.g. a public service) to solve problem A?”.

The workbench uses a tableaux theorem proving method extended with some additional rules to deal with the proposed classical action modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Skarmeas, N.: Modeling Organizations using Roles and Agents. In: Proc. 5th Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Athens (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Normatics: the characterization of computer systems and complex organizations as normative systems, ESPRIT III BRA proposal (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, A., Sergot, M.: Formal Specification of Security Requirements using the Theory of Normative Positions. In: Proc. European Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS'92), LNCS 648, Springer (1992) 103–121

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones, A., Sergot, M.: A formal characterization of Institutionalized Power. Journal of the IGPL (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Santos, F., Carmo, J.: Indirect Action, Influence and Responsibility. In: Brown M, Carmo J (eds). Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems. Springer, Workshops in Computing Series (1996) 194–215

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harel, D.: Dynamic logic. In: Gabbay D, Guenthner F (eds) Handbook of philosophical logic II. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1984) 497–604

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer, J.-J. Ch.: A Different Approach to Deontic Logic: Deontic Logic Viewed as a Variant of Dynamic Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1988) 109–136

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chellas, B.: The logical form of imperatives. Perry Lane Press (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kanger, S.: Law and logic. Theoria 38 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pörn, I.: The logic of power. Blackwell, Oxford (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pörn, I.: Action theory and social science: some formal models. Synthese Library 120, D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lindahl, L.: Position and change — a study in law and logic. Synthese Library 112, D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Belnap, N.: Backwards and forwards in the modal logic of agency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2 (1989) 777–807

    Google Scholar 

  14. Belnap, N., Perloff, M.: In the realm of agents. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 9 (1993) 25–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elgesem, D.: Action theory and modal logic. PhD thesis, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Oslo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Segerberg, K.: Bringing it about. Journal of Philosophical Logic 18(4) (1989) 327–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chellas, B.: Modal logic — an introduction. Cambridge University Press (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hilpinen, R. (ed): Deontic logic: introductory and systematic readings. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hilpinen, R. (ed): New Studies in Deontic Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meyer J-J Ch, Wieringa R (eds). Proc. first international workshop on deontic logic in computer science (DEON'91). Amsterdam (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones, A., Sergot, M. (eds): Proc. second international workshop on deontic logic in computer science (DEON'94). Complex 1/94, NRCCL, Oslo (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brown, M., Carmo, J. (eds): Deontic Logic, Agency and Normative Systems. Springer, Workshops in Computing Series, Sesimbra (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fitting, M.: First-Order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving. Springer-Verlag (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tan, Y., Torre, L.: Representing Deontic reasoning in a Diagnostic Framework. In: Proc. Workshop on Legal Applications of Logic Programming (ICLP'94), Genova (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ramos, P., Fiadeiro, J.: Diagnosis in Organizational Process Design. (submitted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

José Jülio Alferes Luís Moniz Pereira Ewa Orlowska

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Santos, F., Carmo, J. (1996). A modal action logic based framework for organization specification and analysis. In: Alferes, J.J., Pereira, L.M., Orlowska, E. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1126. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61630-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61630-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61630-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70643-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics