Skip to main content

New statistical models for randoms-precorrected PET scans

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Processing in Medical Imaging (IPMI 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1230))

Abstract

PET measurements are usually precorrected for accidental coincidence events by real-time subtraction of the delayed window coincidences. Randoms subtraction compensates in mean for accidental coincidences but destroys the Poisson statistics. We propose and analyze two new approximations to the exact log-likelihood of the precorrected measurements, one based on a “shifted Poisson” model, the other based on saddle-point approximations to the measurement probability mass function (pmf). The methods apply to both emission and transmission tomography; however in this paper we focus on transmission tomography. We compare the new models to conventional data-weighted least squares (WLS) and conventional maximum likelihood (based on the ordinary Poisson (OP) model) using simulations and analytic approximations. The results demonstrate that the proposed methods avoid the systematic bias of the WLS method, and lead to significantly lower variance than the conventional OP method. The saddle-point method provides a more accurate approximation to the exact log-likelihood than the WLS, OP and shifted Poisson alternatives. However, the simpler shifted Poisson method yielded comparable bias-variance performance in the simulations. The new methods offer improved image reconstruction in PET through more realistic statistical modeling, yet with negligible increase in computation over the conventional OP method.

This work was supported in part by NIH grants CA-60711 and CA-54362.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M E Casey and E J Hoffman. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 7 A technique to reduce noise in accidental coincidence measurements and coincidence efficiency calibration. J. Comp. Assisted Tomo., 10(5):845–850, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J A Fessler. Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): Applications to tomography. IEEE Tr. Im. Proc., 5(3):493–506, March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J A Fessler, E P Ficaro, N H Clinthorne, and K Lange. Grouped-coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihood transmission image reconstruction. IEEE Tr. Med. Im., 16, April 1997. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J A Fessler and W L Rogers. Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction methods: Space-invariant tomographs. IEEE Tr. Im. Proc., 5(9):1346–58, September 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C Helstrom. Approximate evaluation of detection probabilities in radar and optical communications. IEEE Tr. Aero. Elec. Sys., 14(4):630–40, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A O Hero, J A Fessler, and M Usman. Exploring estimator bias-variance tradeoffs using the uniform CR bound. IEEE Tr. Sig. Proc., 44(8):2026–41, August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E J Hoffman, S C Huang, M E Phelps, and D E Kuhl. Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 4 Effect of accidental coincidences. J. Comp. Assisted Tomo., 5(3):391–400, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E Ü Mumcuoglu, R M Leahy, and S R Cherry. Bayesian reconstruction of PET images: methodology and performance analysis. Phys. Med. Biol., 41:1777–1807, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. J M Ollinger and J A Fessler. Positron emission tomography. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., 14(1):43–55, January 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D G Politte and D L Snyder. Corrections for accidental coincidences and attenuation in maximum-likelihood image reconstruction for positron-emission tomography. IEEE Tr. Med. Im., 10(1):82–89, March 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S O Rice. Uniform asymptotic expansions for saddle point integrals-application to a probability distribution occuring in noise theory. Bell Syst. Tech J., 47:1971–2013, November 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K Sauer and C Bouman. A local update strategy for iterative reconstruction from projections. IEEE Tr. Sig. Proc., 41(2):534–548, February 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D L Snyder, C W Helstrom, A D Lanterman, M Faisal, and R L White. Compensation for readout noise in CCD images. J. Opt. Soc. Amer. Ser. A, 12(2):272–83, February 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M Yavuz and J A Fessler. Objective functions for tomographic reconstruction from randoms-precorrected PET scans. In Proc. IEEE Nuc. Sci. Symp. Med. Im. Conf., 1996. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

James Duncan Gene Gindi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yavuz, M., Fessler, J.A. (1997). New statistical models for randoms-precorrected PET scans. In: Duncan, J., Gindi, G. (eds) Information Processing in Medical Imaging. IPMI 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1230. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63046-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63046-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63046-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69070-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics