Skip to main content

Using case-based reasoning for argumentation with multiple viewpoints

  • Scientific Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1266))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The integration of classical case-based reasoning with other problem solving methods attracts increasing research interest in the broader area of information and decision support systems. This paper presents a framework where CBR and Argumentation Based Reasoning jointly aid agents to address various discourse instances in group decision making processes. The ability to comprehend and engage in arguments is essential for these environments, while use of precedent cases is well-suited. Cases in our model are not merely considered as representations of past data, but as flexible entities associated with the underlying viewpoint of an agent and the evolution of the corresponding discussion. The paper provides an object-oriented description of the elements involved, and illustrates their dependencies through a comprehensive example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-Based Reasoning: Foundational Issues, Methodological Variations and System Approaches. AI Communications 7(1), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aamodt, A.: Explanation-driven Retrieval, Reuse, and Learning of Cases. In Proceedings of EWCBR'93, pp. 279–284, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alterman, R., Griffin, D.: Remembering Episodes of Question Answering. In Proceedings of EWCBR'94, pp. 235–242, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashley, K.D, Mc Laren, B.M.: Reasoning with Reasons in Case-Based Comparisons. In M. Veloso & A. Aamodt (eds.) Case-Based Reasoning: Research and Development, LNAI 1010, Springer-Verlag, pp. 133–144, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ashley, K.D.: Indexing and Analytical Models. In Hammond K.J. (ed.) Proceedings of DARPA Workshop on CBR, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 197–202, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, M., Watson, I., Filer, N.: Separating the Cases from the Data: Towards More Flexible Case-Based Reasoning. In Proceedings of ICCBR'95, LNAI 1010, Springer-Verlag, pp. 157–168, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R., Snoeck Henkemans, F.: Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Lawrence Erblaum Associates, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. O'Hara, S.: A Blackboard Architecture for Case Re-interpretation of cases. In Proceedings of EWCBR'94, pp. 337–346, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karacapilidis, N.I., Papadias, D., Gordon, T.: An Argumentation Based Framework for Defeasible and Qualitative Reasoning. In D. Borges & C. Kaestner (eds.) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 1159, Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–10, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karacapilidis, N.I., Papadias, D.: A Group Decision and Negotiation Support System for Argumentation Based Reasoning. In G. Antoniou & M. Truszczynski (eds.) Learning and Reasoning with Complex Representations, LNAI Series, Springer-Verlag, 1997. In Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolodner, J.: Case-Based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leake, D.B.: Focusing Construction and Selection of Abductive Hypotheses. In Proceedings of the 11th IJCAI, pp. 24–29, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rumbaugh, J., Blaha, M., Premerlani, W., Eddy, F., Lorensen, W.: Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice-Hall, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Plaza, E., Arcos, J.L., Martin, F.: Cooperative Case-Based Reasoning. In G. Weiss (ed.) Distributed Artificial Intelligence meets Machine Learning, LNAI Series, Springer-Verlag, 1997. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rissland, E.L., Skalak, D.B.: Cabaret: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture. Int. Journal Man-Machine Studies 34, pp. 839–887, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rissland, E.L., Skalak, D.B., Friedman, M.T.: Using Heuristic Search to Retrieve Cases that Support Arguments. In Proceedings of CBR'93 Workshop, AAAI Press, pp. 5–11, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sycara, K.: Resolving Adversarial Conflicts: An Approach Integrating Case-Based and Analytic Methods. Ph.D. diss., School of Information and Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Toulmin, S.E.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Trousse, B., Christiaans, H.: Design as a Topos-based Argumentative Activity: A Protocol Analysis Study. In N. Cross et. al. (eds) Analysing Design Activity, J. Wiley & Sons, pp. 365–388, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Trousse, B., Orel, T., Rothenburger, B., Vogel, C., Charrel, P.J.: Models of Viewpoints Correlation, Technical Report D3 of R&T CNES-INRIA Study of Dynamic Viewpoints, 1996 (in french).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

David B. Leake Enric Plaza

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karacapilidis, N., Trousse, B., Papadias, D. (1997). Using case-based reasoning for argumentation with multiple viewpoints. In: Leake, D.B., Plaza, E. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1266. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63233-6_523

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63233-6_523

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63233-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69238-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics