Skip to main content

Resolution for skeptical stable semantics

  • Regular Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Programming And Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1265))

Abstract

An extension of resolution for skeptical stable model semantics is introduced. Unlike previous approaches, our calculus often needs to consider only a strict subset of the program rules. Moreover, we characterize a large class of programs whose derivations may proceed in a thoroughly goal-directed way. Some inferences, which depend on non-ground negative goals, can be drawn without resorting to negation-as-failure; as a consequence, many goals which flounder in the standard setting, have a successful skeptical derivation. The paper contains a preliminary study of some interesting derivation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K.R. Apt, R.W. Bol, J.W. Klop. On the safe termination of Prolog programs. In Levi and Martelli (eds.), Proc, 6th ICLP, 353–368, Mit Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Bell, A. Nerode, R. Ng, V.S. Subrahmanian. Implementing stable semantics by linear programming. In Proc. of LPNMR'93, pp.23–42, MIT Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.A. Bonatti, N. Olivetti. A sequent calculus for skeptical default logic. In Proc.of TABLEAUX'97, LNAI, Springer Verlag, to appear (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Chen, D.S. Warren. Tabled evaluation with delaying for general logic programs. JACM, 43(1):20–74, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Chen, D.S. Warren. Computation of stable models and its integration with logical query processing. IEEE TKDE, 8(5):742–757, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Gelfond, V. Lifschitz. The stable model semantics for logic programming. In Proc. of the 5th ICLP, pp.1070–1080, MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Gottlob, S. Marcus, A. Nerode, G. Salzer, V.S. Subrahmanian. A non-ground realization of the stable and well-founded semantics. TCS, 166:221–262, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Lifschitz, H. Turner. Splitting a logic program. In Proc. ICLP'94, pp.23–37, MIT Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.W. Lloyd. Foundations of Logic Programming, Springer-Verlag, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Marek, M. Truszczyński. Computing Intersection of Autoepistemic Expansions. In Proc. LPNMR'91, pp.37–52, MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I.Niemela, P. Simons. Efficient implementation of the well-founded and stable model semantics. In Proc. of JICSLP 96, pp.289–303, MIT Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. Schaub, M. Thielscher. Skeptical query answering in constrained default logic. In Proc. of the Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR '96), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V.S. Subrahmanian, D. Nau, C. Vago. WFS+Branch and bound=Stable models. IEEE TKDE, 7(3):362–377, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jürgen Dix Ulrich Furbach Anil Nerode

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bonatti, P.A. (1997). Resolution for skeptical stable semantics. In: Dix, J., Furbach, U., Nerode, A. (eds) Logic Programming And Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1265. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63255-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63255-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63255-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69249-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics