Skip to main content

Monotone extensions of boolean data sets

  • Session 5
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1316))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

As a form of knowledge acquisition from data, we consider the problem of computing “monotone” extensions of a pair of data sets (T, F), where T (resp., F) ⊑ {0, 1}n is a set of positive (resp., negative) examples, and an extension is a Boolean function that is consistent with (T, F). A motivation of this study comes from an observation that real world data are often monotone (or at least approximately monotone), and in such cases it is natural to build monotone extensions. We define five types of monotone extensions called error-free, best-fit, consistent, robust and most-robust extensions to deal with various cases, in which (T, F) may contain errors and/or incomplete data. We provide polynomial time algorithms for constructing error-free, best-fit, consistent and robust extensions. For most-robust extensions, we show that the problem is solvable in polynomial time if AS(a) ≤ 1 holds for all aTF, where AS(a) denotes the set of missing bits in a vector a, but is NP-hard even if AS(a) < 2 holds for all aTF. We also give an approximability result for computing a most-robust extension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Anthony and N. Biggs, Computational Learning Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Ben-David, Monotonicity maintenance in information-theoretic machine learning algorithms, Machine Learning 19 (1995) 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ben-David, L. Sterling and Y. H. Pao, Learning and classification of monotonic ordinal concepts, Computational Intelligence 5 (1989) 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Boros, V. Gurvich, P. L. Hammer, T. Ibaraki and A. Kogan, Decomposability of partially defined Boolean functions, Discrete Applied Mathematics, 62 (1995) 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Boros, P. L. Hammer, T. Ibaraki, A. Kogan, E. Mayoraz and I. Muchnik, An implementation of logical analysis of data, RUTCOR Research Report RRR 22-96, Rutgers University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Boros, T. Ibaraki and K. Makino, Error-free and best-fit extensions of a partially defined Boolean function, RUTCOR Research Report RRR 14-95, Rutgers University, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Boros, T. Ibaraki and K. Makino, Extensions of partially defined Boolean functions with missing data, RUTCOR Research Report RRR 06-96, Rutgers University (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Boros, T. Ibaraki and K. Makino, Boolean analysis of incomplete examples, SWAT '96 Algorithm Theory, edited by R. Karlsson and A. Lingas, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1097 (1996) 440–451.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Crama, P. L. Hammer and T. Ibaraki, Cause-effect relationships and partially defined boolean functions, Annals of Operations Research, 16 (1988) 299–326.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. U. M. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth and R. Uthurusamy, Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Kavvadias, C. H. Papadimitriou and M. Sideri, On Horn envelopes and hypergraph transversals, ISAAC'93 Algorithms and Computation, edited by K. W. Ng et al., Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 762 (1993) 399–405.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kearns, M. Li and L. Valiant, Learning Boolean formulas, Journal of ACM, 41 (1994) 1298–1328.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. W. Kuhn, The Hungarian method for solving the assignment problem, Naval Res. Logist. Quart., 2 (1955) 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. W. Kuhn, Variants of the Hungarian method for solving the assignment problem, Naval Res. Logist. Quart., 3 (1956) 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Makino, K. Hatanaka and T. Ibaraki, Horn extensions of a partially defined Boolean function, RUTCOR Research Report RRR 27-95, Rutgers University, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Makino, K. Yano and T. Ibaraki, Positive and Horn decomposability of partially defined Boolean functions, Discrete Applied Mathematics, 74 (1997) 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. R. Quinlan, Induction of decision trees, Machine Learning 1 (1986) 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. G. Valiant, A theory of the learnable, Communications of the ACM 27 (1984) 1134–1142. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A0008157 00004

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ming Li Akira Maruoka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Borosl, E., Ibaraki, T., Makino, K. (1997). Monotone extensions of boolean data sets. In: Li, M., Maruoka, A. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1316. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63577-7_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63577-7_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63577-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69602-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics