Skip to main content

Experiments using context and significance to enhance the reporting capabilities of gis

  • New Approaches to Spatial Information
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1329))

Abstract

The use of a contextual reporting technique, to supplement the basic display of geographic data has been previously described (Gahegan, 1994; 1995). Standard forms of graphical and textual reporting are embellished with deductions regarding the significance of reported values, using automated reasoning to examine data within a defined context. This paper explores some of the different types of reporting behaviour that can be made available within a GIS, by defining context in terms of the geographic properties of data. Such a context may be defined over any group of geographic objects, and then specialised, using constraints in the spatial and temporal domains, or generalised, using the class specialisation hierarchy to examine progressively broader contexts. A brief formalism for geographic context is developed. Results are presented using a dataset of agricultural land and these show the adaptive nature of the reporting behaviour and demonstrate some of its potential uses. A discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of the approach is also given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, J. F. (1984). Towards a general theory of action and time. Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 123–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, M. and Sciore, E. (1988). Meta-functions and contexts in an object-oriented database language. Proc. SIGMOD, International Conference on Management of Data, ACM Press, pp. 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, S. (1990). Qualitative spatial reasoning: a semi-quantitative approach using fuzzy logic. In: Design and Implementation of Large Spatial Databases (Eds. Buchmann, A., Günther, O., Smith, T. R. and Wang, Y.-F.) Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 345–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer, M. J. and Franzosa, R. D. (1991). Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flack, J. C. (1996). Interpretation of remotely sensed data using guided techniques for landcover analysis. PhD thesis, Department of GIS, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. U. (1992). Qualitative spatial reasoning about distances and directions in geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, Vol. 3, pp. 343–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahegan, M. N. (1994). Support for the contextual interpretation of data within an object-oriented GIS. Proc. 6th International. Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, (Ed. Waugh, T. C. and Healey, R. G.), Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 988–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahegan, M. N. (1995). Proximity operators for qualitative spatial reasoning. In: Spatial Information Theory (Eds. Frank, A. U. and Kuhn, W.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science 988, Springer Verlag, pp. 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, J.-H. (1994). Qualitative distance and direction reasoning in geographic space. PhD Thesis, University of Maine, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, B. (1978). Modelling spatial knowledge. Cognitive Science, Vol. 2, pp. 129–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, U. and Ekman, G. (1973). Subjective geographic distance: a multidimensional comparison. Psychometrika, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. A. and Gahegan, M. N. (1991). Supporting the notion of context within a database environment for intelligent reporting and query optimisation. European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, J., Flewelling, D. M. and Egenhofer, M. J. (1994). A qualitative spatial reasoner. Proc. 6th. International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, (Eds. Waugh, T. C. and Healey, R. G.), Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 665–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1962). The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Psychometrika, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. R. and Park, K. K. (1992). Algebraic approach to spatial reasoning. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, Vol. 8, pp. 199–249 (part I), Vol. 8, pp. 301–357 (part II), Vol. 9, pp. 43–80 (part III).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1989). Knowledge representation in fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H. J. and Zysno, P. (1980). Latent connectives in human decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 4, pp. 37–51. *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A0008169 00009

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stephen C. Hirtle Andrew U. Frank

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gahegan, M. (1997). Experiments using context and significance to enhance the reporting capabilities of gis. In: Hirtle, S.C., Frank, A.U. (eds) Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1329. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63623-4_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63623-4_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63623-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69616-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics