Skip to main content

Integrated correction of ill-formed sentences

  • NLP and User Modelling
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence (AI 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1342))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes a system that performs hierarchical error recovery, and detects and corrects a single error in a sentence at the lexical, syntactic, and/or semantic levels. If the system is unable to repair an erroneous sentence on the assumption that it has a single error, a multiple error recovery system is invoked. The system employs a chart parsing algorithm and uses an augmented context-free grammar, and has subsystems for lexical, syntactic, surface case, and semantic processing, which are controlled by an integrated-agenda system. In the frequent case that there is a choice of possible repairs, the possible repairs are ranked by penalty scores. The penalty scores are based on grammar-dependent and grammar-independent heuristics. The grammar-independent ones involve error types, and, at the lexical level, character distance; the grammar-dependent ones involve, at the syntactic level, the significance of the repaired constituent in a local tree, and, at the semantic level, the distance between the semantic form containing the error, and normal act templates. This paper focuses on single error recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, S. and Backhouse, R. (1981). Locally Least-cost Error Recovery in Earley's Algorithm. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 3(3): 318–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonell, J. and Hayes, P. (1983). Recovery Strategies for Parsing Extragrammatical Language. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 9(3–4): 123–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damerau, F. (1964). A Technique for Computer Detection and Correction of Spelling Errors. Communications of the ACM, 7(3): 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fass, D. and Wilks, Y. (1983). Preference Semantics, Ill-formedness, and Metaphor. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 9(3–4): 178–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grishman, R. and Peng, P. (1988). Responding to Semantically Ill-Formed Input. The 2nd Conference of Applied Natural Language Processing, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irons, E. (1963). An Error-Correcting Parse Algorithm. Communications of the ACM, 6(11): 669–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T. (1994). Yet Another Chart-Based Technique for Parsing Ill-formed Input. The Fourth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. (1974). Syntax-Directed Least-Errors Analysis for Context-Free Languages: A Practical Approach. Communications of the ACM, 17(1): 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellish, C. (1989). Some Chart-Based Techniques for Parsing Ill-Formed Input. ACL Proceedings, 27th Annual Meeting, 102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, K. and Wilson, W. H. (1995). Are Efficient Natural Language Parsers Robust?. Eighth Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence; 283–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, R. (1987). Spelling Checkers, Spelling Correctors and the Misspellings of Poor Spellers. Information Processing and Management, 23(5): 495–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. (1980). Computer Programs for Detecting and Correcting Spelling Errors. Communications of the ACM, 23(12): 676–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosse, T. (1992). Detecting and Correcting Morpho-Syntactic Errors in Real Texts. The Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weischedel, R. and Sondheimer, N. (1983). Meta-rules as Basis for Processing Informed Input. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 9(3–4): 161–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C., Eastman, C., and Oakman, R. (1991). An Analysis of ill-formed Input in Natural Language Queries to Document Retrieval Systems. Information Processing and Management, 27(6): 615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Abdul Sattar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Min, K., Wilson, W.H. (1997). Integrated correction of ill-formed sentences. In: Sattar, A. (eds) Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence. AI 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1342. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63797-4_90

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63797-4_90

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63797-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69649-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics