Skip to main content

A relational modeling of cognitive maps

  • Reasoning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1418))

Abstract

Causal reasoning involves many interacting concepts that make them difficult to deal with, and for which analytical techniques are inadequate. A cognitive map can be employed, as a tool for qualitative reasoning, to cope with this type of knowledge. Cognitive maps have been used for decision analysis, administrative sciences, management sciences, distributed AI and distributed group decision support. In this paper, we present a formal model for cognitive maps with a precise semantics based on relation algebra. In this way, we justify the classical intuitive inference mechanisms, based on reasoning from causes to effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelrod, A. editor: Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton University Press (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buede, D. M. and Ferrell, D. Convergence in problem solving: A prelude to quantitative analysis. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 23 (1993) 746–765

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chaib-draa, B. Causal Reasoning in Multiagent Systems. MAAMAW'97-Agents and Multiagent Systems. M. Boman (ed.), LNAI, Springer-Verlag (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eden, C. J. and Sims, D. Thinking in organizations. Macmillan, London (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly, G. A. The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New:Norton (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kosko, B. Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems. Prentice Hall (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ladkin, L. B. and Maddux, R. D. On binary constraint problems. Jour. of ACM. 41(3) (1994) 435–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levi, A. and Tetlock, P. E. A cognitive analysis of Japan's 1941 decision for war. Journ. of Conflict Resolution. 24 (1980) 195–211

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nakumara, K., Iwai, S. and Sawaragi. T. Decision support using causation knowledge base. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 12 (1982) 765–777.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Park, K. S. and uKim, S. H. Fuzzy cognitive maps considering time relationships. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies. 42 (1995) 157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross, L. L. and Hall, R. I. Influence diagrams and organizational power. Admin. Sci. Q. 25 (1980) 57–71

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt, G. and Ströhlein, T. Relations and Graphs. Monog. on Theor. Comput. Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smithin, T. and Sims, D. Ubi Caritas?—Modeling beliefs about charities. Eur. J. Opl Res. 10 (1982) 273–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wellman, M. P. Inference in cognitive maps. Math. and Comp. in Simul. 36 (1994) 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, W. R., Chen, S. S. and King, R. S. A cognitive map based approach to the coordination of distributed cooperative agents. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 22(1) (1992) 103–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert E. Mercer Eric Neufeld

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chaib-draa, B. (1998). A relational modeling of cognitive maps. In: Mercer, R.E., Neufeld, E. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1418. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64575-6_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64575-6_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64575-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69349-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics