Skip to main content

A Model of Interaction in Concurrent and Distributed Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 367 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1429))

Abstract

Distributed programming environments commonly restrict programmers to one form of intercomponent interaction. This forces programmers to emulate other interaction styles in terms of the dominant paradigm, obscuring their intent and resulting in a loss of clarity. Starting from a clear model of interaction between program components, this paper attempts to restore this missing clarity of intent. It achieves this by proposing a language tailored to the description of new and existing interaction styles that separates the specification of intercomponent interaction from the programming interface visible internally to the component.

This research funded by British Telecom as part of the Management of Multiservice Networks project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BN84 A. Birrell and B. Nelson. Implementing Remote Procedure Calls. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2(1): 39–59, February 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDFK95 S. Crane, N. Dulay, H. Fosså, J. Kramer, J. Magee, M. Sloman and K. Twidle. Configuration Management for Distributed Software Services. In Y. Raynaud, A. Sethi and F. Faure-Vincent, editors, Integrated Network Management IV, pps 29–42. Chapman and Hall, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane97 S. Crane. Dynamic Binding for Distributed Systems. PhD Thesis, Imperial College, University of London, March 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • FKT94 I. Foster, C. Kesselman and S. Tuecke. Nexus: Runtime Support for Task-Parallel Programming Languages. Technical Report, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne Il. 60439, August 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried87 S. Friedberg. Transparent Reconfiguration requires a Third-Party Connect. Technical Report 220, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, November 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • GHJV94 E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • GSM92 M. Mouly and M.-B. Pautet. The GSM System for Mobile Communications. ISBN 2-9507190-0-7. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • LN79 H. Lauer and R. Needham. On the Duality of Operating System Structures. Operating Systems Review, 13(2): 3–19, April 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee97 J. Magee. FSP Notation. Electronic document available on the World Wide Web at the URL http://www-dse.doc.ic.ac.uk/~jnm/LTSdocumention/FSPnotation.html

  • MDEK95 J. Magee, N. Dulay, S. Eisenbach and J. Kramer. Specifying Distributed Software Architectures. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Software Engineering Conference, Barcelona, September 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer88 B. Meyer. Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice-Hall International Series in Computer Science, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • MGK96 K. Moazami-Goudarzi and Jeff Kramer. Maintaining Node Consistency in the Face of Dynamic Change. In Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Configurable Distributed Systems, pp. 62–69, IEEE Computer Society Press, Annapolis Maryland, U.S.A, May 1996.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MPIF93 Message Passing Interface Forum, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee. Document for a Standard Message-Passing Interface, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • ODP95 Secretariat: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC21/WG7. Reference Model of Open Distributed Processing, part 3: Architecture. Document ITU-T X.903 (ISO/IEC 10746-3). Standards Association of Australia, PO Box 1055, Strathfield, NSW, Australia 2135, May 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMG95 The Object Management Group, The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification, Version 2.0. The Object Management Group, OMG Headquarters, 492 Old Connecticut Path, Framington, MA 01701, USA. July 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rog97 D. Rogerson. Inside COM — Microsoft’s Component Object Model. Microsoft Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt97 D.C. Schmidt, Acceptor and Connector: Design Patterns for Actively and Passively Initializing Network Services. In Pattern Languages of Program Design, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • SV97 D. C. Schmidt and S. Vinoski. Object Adapters: Concepts and Terminology. Object Interconnections #11, SIGS C++ Report, October 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pryce, N., Crane, S. (1998). A Model of Interaction in Concurrent and Distributed Systems. In: van der Linden, F. (eds) Development and Evolution of Software Architectures for Product Families. ARES 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1429. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68383-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68383-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64916-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68383-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics