Skip to main content

Some Reasons Why Learning Science is Hard: Can Computer Based Law Encoding Diagrams Make It Easier?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1452))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Law EncodingDiagrams, LEDs, may be an effective approach to promotingconceptual learning in science. This paper considers why by decomposing the problem of what makes science hard to learn into five generaldifficulties. How LEDs may address each of these difficulties areconsidered in the context of a novel class of LEDs for electricity, AVOW diagrams. Further, thedesign requirements of ITSs that exploit LEDs can be analysed in terms of the difficulties, as illustrated by the description of the positivefeatures and limitations of a computer based learning environment that has been built to exploit AVOWdiagrams for learning about electricity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A., T., Koedinger, K., R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned. The Journal Of The Learning Sciences, 4(2) (1995) 167–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bechtel, W., Richardson, R. C.: Discovering complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, P. C.-H.: Scientific Discovery with Law Encoding Diagrams. Creativity Research Journal 9(2&3) (1996) 145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng, P. C.-H.: Law Encoding Diagrams for Instructional Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 7(1) (1996) 33–74

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, P. C.-H.: Learning Qualitative Relations in Physics with Law Encoding Diagrams. In: Cottrell G. (ed.): Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1996) 512–517

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng, P. C.-H.: Interactive Law Encoding Diagrams for Learning and Instruction. Learning and Instruction (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng, P. C.-H., & Simon, H. A.: Scientific Discovery and Creative Reasoning with Diagrams. In: Smith, S., Ward, T., Finke, R. (eds.): The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (1995) 205–228

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., de Leeuw, N.: From things to processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change for Learning Science Concepts. Learning and Instruction. 4 (1994) 27–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duit, R., Jung, W., & von Rhšneck, C. (eds.): Aspects of Understanding Electricity. Institute for the Pedagogy of Natural Science, University of Kiel (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Egan, D. E., Schwartz, B. J.: Chunking in Recall of Symbolic Drawings. Memory and Cognition 7(2) (1979) 149–158

    Google Scholar 

  11. Halford, G.: Children’s Understanding. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hewitt, P.: Conceptual Physics. 3rd ed. Harper Collins, New York, NY (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., Simon, H.A.: Why are Some Problems Hard? Cognitive Psychology 17 (1985) 248–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Larkin, J. H., Simon, H. A.: Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11 (1987) 65–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lesgold, A., Lajoie, S., Bunzo, M., Eggan, G.: Sherlock: A Coached Practice Environment for an Electronics Troubleshooting Job. In: Larkin, J., Carboy, R. (eds.): Computer Assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (1992) 201–238

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, H.A.: Sciences of the Artificial. 2nd ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reif, F.: Interpretation of Scientific or Mathematical Concepts: Cognitive Issues and Instructional Implications. Cognitive Science 11 (1987) 395–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H.: Understanding Constraint-Based Processes: A Precursor to Conceptual Change in Physics. In: Cottrell, G. W. (ed.): Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1996) 306–311

    Google Scholar 

  19. White, B.: ThinkerTools: Causal Models, Conceptual Change, and Science Education. Cognition and Instruction 10(1) (1993) 1–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cheng, P.CH. (1998). Some Reasons Why Learning Science is Hard: Can Computer Based Law Encoding Diagrams Make It Easier?. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1452. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64770-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68716-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics