Abstract
This paper discusses a three-year experiment to build a distributed research group, equipped with state-of-the-art computing facilities, spread over three cities in Australia. Despite the provision of the sorts of facilities to be expected in cooperative buildings, such as high-speed networks and videoconferencing, significant synergy (i.e., closely-coupled collaborations) among the distributed subgroups did not develop. This was not only due to the problems of distance, but was exacerbated by several political and organizational issues. An important lesson is that successful ‘cooperative buildings’ will depend not just on the technology but also on an appropriate managerial, organizational and political climate in which these resources can be meaningfully exploited. The paper outlines the experiment, discusses why synergies did not emerge, and points to implications for cooperative buildings and design paradigms based on the notion of pattern languages.
This work has been supported by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under grants F30603-94-C-0161 and F30602-96-2-0264 administered by the US Air Force, and by the Cooperative Research Centres Program through the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet of the Commonwealth Government of Australia. The views and conclusions expressed in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, expressed or implied, of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or the U.S. Government. We would like to thank the members of IEU for their openness, assistance and friendship during the course of this study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C. (1979). The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Oxford University Press. Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jacobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A Pattern Language-Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, C., Silverstein, M., Angel, S., Ishikawia, S., & Abrams, D. (1975). The Oregon Experiment. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brand, S. (1995). How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. New York: Penguin.
Coplien, J. O. (1995). A Generative Development-Process Pattern Language. In: J. O. Coplien, & D. C. Schmidt (Eds.), Pattern Languages of Program Design. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. 183–237.
Dourish, P. and Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supported awareness in a distributed work group. In: ACM Proceedings of CHI’92. ACM Press. 541–547.
Fitzpatrick, G., Kaplan, S. M., & Mansfield, T. (1996). Physical spaces, virtual places and social worlds: A study of work in the virtual. In: CSCW’96. Boston, MA.: ACM. 334–343.
Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Or-ganizational Interfaces. In: ACM Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Portland, OR.: ACM Press. 85–93.
Strauss, A. (1993). Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fitzpatrick, G., Kaplan, S., Parsowith, S. (1998). Experience in Building a Cooperative Distributed Organization: Lessons for Cooperative Buildings. In: Streitz, N.A., Konomi, S., Burkhardt, HJ. (eds) Cooperative Buildings: Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture. CoBuild 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1370. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69706-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69706-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64237-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69706-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive