Skip to main content

Randomization in Distributed Computing

1996; Chandra

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Algorithms
  • 173 Accesses

Keywords and Synonyms

Agreement; Byzantine agreement                

Problem Definition

This problem is concerned with using the multi-writer multi-reader register primitive in the shared memory model to design a fast, wait-free implementation of consensus. Below are detailed descriptions of each of these terms.

Consensus Problems

There are n processors and the goal is to design distributed algorithms to solve the following two consensus problems for these processors.

Problem 1 (Binary consensus)

Input: Processor i has input bit b i .

Output: Each processor i has output bit \( { b^{\prime}_i } \) such that: 1) all the output bits \( { b^{\prime}_i } \) equal the same value v; and 2) \( { v = b_i } \) for some processor i.

Problem 2 (Id consensus)

Input: Processor i has a unique id u i .

Output: Each processor i has output value \( { u^{\prime}_i } \) such that: 1) all the output values \( { u^{\prime}_i } \) equal the same value u; and 2) \( { u = u_i } \) for some processor i.

Wait-Free

This result...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 399.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Aspnes, J.: Randomized protocols for asynchronous consensus. Distrib. Comput. 16(2–3), 165–175 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aspnes, J., Waarts, O.: Randomized consensus in expected \( { o(n \log^2 n) } \) operations per processor. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science. 24–26 October 1992, pp. 137–146. IEEE Computer Society, Pittsburgh (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Attiya, H., Censor, K.: Tight bounds for asynchronous randomized consensus. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on the Theory of Computation. San Diego, 11–13 June 2007 ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory (SIGACT) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aumann, Y.: Efficient asynchronous consensus with the weak adversary scheduler. In: Symposium on Principles of Distrib. Comput.(PODC) Santa Barbara, 21–24 August 1997, pp. 209–218. ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory (SIGACT) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aumann, Y., Kapach-Levy, A.: Cooperative sharing and asynchronous consensus using single-reader/single-writer registers. In: Proceedings of 10th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium of Discrete Algorithms (SODA) Baltimore, 17–19 January 1999, pp. 61–70. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dolev, D., Dwork, C., Stockmeyer, L.: On the minimal synchronism needed for distributed consensus. J. ACM (JACM) 34(1), 77–97 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD Symposium on Principles of Database System (PODS) Atlante, 21–23 March, pp. 1–7. Association for Computational Machinery (ACM) (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herlihy, M.: Wait-free synchronization. ACM Trans. Programm. Lang. Syst. 13(1), 124–149 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lynch, N.: Distributed Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Chandra, T.D. (2008). Randomization in Distributed Computing. In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30162-4_321

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics