Skip to main content

Health Care in the United States, System Dynamics Applications to

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science
  • 251 Accesses

Definition of the Subject

Health care involves a complex system of interactions among patients, providers, payers, and other stakeholders. This system is difficult tomanage in the United States because of its free market approach and relative lack of regulation. System Dynamics simulation modeling is an effectivemethod for understanding and explaining causes of dysfunction in U.S. health care and for suggesting approaches to improving health outcomes and slowingrising costs. Applications since the 1970s have covered diverse areas in health care including the epidemiology of diseases and substance abuse, as wellas the dynamics of health care capacity and delivery and their impacts on health. Many of these applications have dealt with the mounting burden ofchronic illnesses, such as diabetes. In this article four such applications are described.

Introduction

Despite remarkable successes in some areas, the health enterprise in the United States faces difficult challenges in meeting its...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Chronic illness :

A disease or adverse health state that persists over time and cannot in general be cured, although its symptoms may be treatable.

Stock:

An accumulation or state variable, such as the size of a population.

Flow:

A rate-of‐change variable affecting a stock, such as births flowing into a population or deaths flowing out.

Feedback loop:

A closed loop of causality that acts to counterbalance or reinforce prior change in a system state.

Bibliography

  1. American Diabetes Association and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestiveand Kidney Diseases (2002) The prevention or delay of Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:742–749

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Heart Association (2000) 2001 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. AHA,Dallas

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson R (1994) Populations, infectious disease and immunity: A verynonlinear world. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B346:457–505

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowman BA, Gregg EW, Williams DE, Engelgau MM, Jack Jr L (2003) Translating thescience of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention to inform the public health response to diabetes. J Public Health Mgmt Pract November(Suppl):S8–S14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic DiseasePrevention and Health Promotion (2007) Chronic Disease Overview. Available athttp://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/overview.htm

  6. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2002) Reduction in the incidence ofType 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. New Engl J Med 346:393–403

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL (2002) Prevalence and trends inobesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA 288:1723–1727

    Google Scholar 

  8. Forrester JW, Senge PM (1980) Tests for building confidence in system dynamicsmodels. In: System Dynamics, TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences. North‐Holland, New York,pp 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  9. Forrester JW (1971) Counterintuitive behavior of social systems. Technol Rev73:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  10. Forrester JW (1980) Information sources for modeling the nationaleconomy. J Amer Stat Assoc 75:555–574

    Google Scholar 

  11. Forrester JW (1961) Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press,Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  12. Forrester JW (1969) Urban Dynamics. MIT Press,Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gunning-Schepers LJ (1989) The health benefits of prevention:A simulation approach. Health Policy Spec Issue 12:1–255

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halloran EM, Longini IM, Nizam A, Yang Y (2002) Containing bioterroristsmallpox. Science 298:1428–1432

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heirich M (1999) Rethinking Health Care: Innovation and Change inAmerica. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hirsch GB (2004) Modeling the consequences of major incidents for health caresystems. In: 22nd International System Dynamics Conference. System Dynamics Society, Oxford. Available from:http://www.systemdynamics.org/publications.htm

  17. Hirsch G, Homer J (2004) Integrating chronic illness management, improvedaccess to care, and idealized clinical practice design in health care organizations: A systems thinking approach. In: International Conference onSystems Thinking in Management. AFEI/University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Available from:http://www.afei.org/documents/CDRomOrderForm.pdf

  18. Hirsch G, Homer J (2004) Modeling the dynamics of health care services forimproved chronic illness management. In: 22nd International System Dynamics Conference. System Dynamics Society, Oxford. Available from:http://www.systemdynamics.org/publications.htm

  19. Hirsch GB, Immediato CS (1999) Microworlds and generic structures as resourcesfor integrating care and improving health. Syst Dyn Rev 15:315–330

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hirsch GB, Killingsworth WR (1975) A new framework for projecting dentalmanpower requirements. Inquiry 12:126–142

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hirsch G, Miller S (1974) Evaluating HMO policies with a computersimulation model. Med Care 12:668–681

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hoard M, Homer J, Manley W, Furbee P, Haque A, Helmkamp J (2005) Systemsmodeling in support of evidence‐based disaster planning for rural areas. Int J Hyg Environ Health208:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  23. Homer J, Hirsch G, Milstein B (2007) Chronic illness in a complex healtheconomy: The perils and promises of downstream and upstream reforms. Syst Dyn Rev 23(2–3):313–334

    Google Scholar 

  24. Homer J, Hirsch G, Minniti M, Pierson M (2004) Models for collaboration: Howsystem dynamics helped a community organize cost‐effective care for chronic illness. Syst Dyn Rev 20:199–222

    Google Scholar 

  25. Homer J, Milstein B, Dietz W, Buchner D, Majestic E (2006) Obesity populationdynamics: Exploring historical growth and plausible futures in the U.S. In: 24th International System Dynamics Conference. System Dynamics Society,Nijmegen. Available from: http://www.systemdynamics.org/publications.htm

  26. Homer J, Milstein B (2002) Communities with multiple afflictions:A system dynamics approach to the study and prevention of syndemics. In: 20th International System Dynamics Conference. System Dynamics Society,Palermo. Available from: http://www.systemdynamics.org/publications.htm

  27. Homer J, Milstein B (2004) Optimal decision making in a dynamic model ofcommunity health. In: 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Waikoloa. Available from:http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/03/2056toc.htm

  28. Homer J, Ritchie‐Dunham J, Rabbino H, Puente LM, Jorgensen J, HendricksK (2000) Toward a dynamic theory of antibiotic resistance. Syst Dyn Rev 16:287–319

    Google Scholar 

  29. Homer JB, St. Clair CL (1991) A model of HIV transmission through needlesharing. Interfaces 21:26–49

    Google Scholar 

  30. Homer JB (1993) A system dynamics model of national cocaineprevalence. Syst Dyn Rev 9:49–78

    Google Scholar 

  31. Honeycutt AA, Boyle JP, Broglio KR et al (2003) A dynamic Markov modelfor forecasting diabetes prevalence in the United States through 2050. Health Care Mgmt Sci 6:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  32. Institute of Medicine (Board on Health Sciences Policy) (2003) UnequalTreatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  33. Institute of Medicine (Committee on Quality of Health Care in America) (2001)Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jones AP, Homer JB, Murphy DL, Essien JDK, Milstein B, Seville DA (2006)Understanding diabetes population dynamics through simulation modeling and experimentation. Am J Public Health96(3):488–494

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kaplan EH, Craft DL, Wein LM (2002) Emergency response to a smallpoxattack: The case for mass vaccination. In: Proceedings of the Natl Acad of Sciences 99:10935–10940

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lee P, Paxman D (1997) Reinventing public health. Annu Rev Public Health18:1–35

    Google Scholar 

  37. Levin G, Roberts EB, Hirsch GB (1975) The Persistent Poppy. Ballinger,Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  38. Levin G, Roberts EB, Hirsch GB, Kligler DS, Wilder JF, Roberts N (1976) TheDynamics of Human Service Delivery. Ballinger, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lindblom E (2006) State cigarette excise tax rates and rankings. Campaign forTobacco‐Free Kids, Washington, DC. Available from:http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/research/factsheets/pdf/0097.pdf

  40. Luginbuhl W, Forsyth B, Hirsch G, Goodman M (1981) Prevention andrehabilitation as a means of cost‐containment: The example of myocardial infarction. J Public Health Policy2:1103–1115

    Google Scholar 

  41. Manley W, Homer J et al (2005) A dynamic model to support surge capacityplanning in a rural hospital. In: 23rd International System Dynamics Conference, Boston. Available from:http://www.systemdynamics.org/publications.htm

  42. Marshall T (2000) Exploring a fiscal food policy: The case of diet andischaemic heart disease. BMJ 320:301–305

    Google Scholar 

  43. Milstein B, Jones A, Homer J, Murphy D, Essien J, Seville D (2007) ChartingPlausible Futures for Diabetes Prevalence in the United States: A Role for System Dynamics Simulation Modeling. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(3), July2007. Available at: http://www .cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2007/jul/06_0070.htm

  44. Naidoo B, Thorogood M, McPherson K, Gunning-Schepers LJ (1997) Modeling theeffects of increased physical activity on coronary heart disease in England and Wales. J Epidemiol Community Health51:144–150

    Google Scholar 

  45. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2004)National Diabetes Statistics. Available from: http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/index.htm

  46. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2004)Statistics Related to Overweight and Obesity. Available from:http://www.niddk.nih.gov/health/nutrit/pubs/statobes.htm#preval

  47. O'Connell JB, Bristow MR (1993) Economic impact of heart failure in the UnitedStates: Time for a different approach. J Heart Lung Transplant 13(suppl):S107-S112

    Google Scholar 

  48. O'Donoghue T, Rabin M (2006) Optimal sin taxes. J Public Econ90:1825–1849

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ratanawijitrasin S (1993) The dynamics of health care finance: A feedbackview of system behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation, SUNY Albany

    Google Scholar 

  50. Roberts EB, Homer J, Kasabian A, Varrell M (1982) A systems view of thesmoking problem: Perspective and limitations of the role of science in decision‐making. Int J Biomed Comput13:69–86

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schlessinger L, Eddy DM (2002) Archimedes: A new model for simulatinghealth care systems—the mathematical formulation. J Biomed Inform 35:37–50

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schorr LB (1997) Common Purpose: Strengthening Families and Neighborhoods toRebuild America. Doubleday/Anchor Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  53. Singer M, Clair S (2003) Syndemics and public health: Reconceptualizingdisease in bio‐social context. Med Anthropol Q 17:423–441

    Google Scholar 

  54. Singer M (1996) A dose of drugs, a touch of violence, a case ofAIDS: Conceptualizing the SAVA syndemic. Free Inquiry 24:99–110

    Google Scholar 

  55. Sterman JD (1988) A skeptic's guide to computer models. In: Grant L (ed)Foresight and National Decisions. University Press of America, Lanham, pp 133–169

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sterman JD (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw‐Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tompson KM, Tebbens RJD (2007) Eradication versus control for poliomyelitis: An economic analysis. Lancet 369:1363–1371. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60532-7

    Google Scholar 

  58. Tengs TO, Osgood ND, Chen LL (2001) The cost‐effectiveness of intensivenational school‐based anti‐tobacco education: Results from the tobacco policy model. Prev Med 33:558–70

    Google Scholar 

  59. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998) Tight blood pressure control andrisk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in Type 2 diabetes. The Lancet 352:703–713

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vennix JAM (1996) Group Model‐building: Facilitating Team Learning UsingSystem Dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  61. Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM et al (2001) Effect of improved glycemiccontrol on health care costs and utilization. JAMA 285(2):182–189

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wallace R (1988) A synergism of plagues. Environ Res47:1–33

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wolfson MC (1994) POHEM: A framework for understanding and modeling thehealth of human populations. World Health Stat Q 47:157–176

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Zack MM, Moriarty DG, Stroup DF, Ford ES, Mokdad AH (2004) Worsening trends inadult health‐related quality of life and self-rated health–United States, 1993-2001. Public Health Rep119:493–505

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hirsch, G., Homer, J. (2009). Health Care in the United States, System Dynamics Applications to. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_270

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics