Definition of the Subject
The most fundamental question in earthquake science is whether earthquake prediction is possible. Related issues include the following: Can a prediction of earthquakes solely based on the emergence of seismicity patterns be reliable? In other words, is there a single or several “magic” parameters, which become anomalous prior to a large earthquake? Are pure observational methods without specific physical understanding, like the pattern recognition approach of Keilis–Borok and co-workers [41], sufficient? Taking into account that earthquakes are monitored continuously only for about 100 years and the best available data sets (“earthquake catalogs”) cover only a few decades, it seems questionable to forecast earthquakes solely on the basis of observed seismicity patterns . This is because large earthquakes have recurrence periods of decades to centuries; consequently, data sets for most regions include less than ten large events making a reliable...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- Bayesian analysis:
-
A model estimation technique that accounts for incomplete knowledge. Bayes' theorem is a mathematical formulation of how an a priori estimate of the probability of an event can be updated, if a new information becomes available.
- Critical earthquake concept:
-
The occurrence of large earthquakes may be described in terms of statistical physics and thermodynamics. In this view, an earthquake can be interpreted as a critical phase transition in a system with many degrees of freedom. The preparatory process is characterized by acceleration of the seismic moment release and growth of the spatial correlation length as in the percolation model. This interpretation of earthquake occurrence is referred to as the critical earthquake process.
- Earthquake forecast/prediction:
-
The forecast or prediction of an earthquake is a statement about time, hypocenter location, magnitude, and probability of occurrence of an individual future event within reasonable error ranges.
- Fault model :
-
A fault model calculates the evolution of slip, stress, and related quantities on a fault segment or a fault region. The range of fault models varies from conceptual models of cellular automaton or slider-block type to detailed models for particular faults.
- Probability:
-
A quantitative measure of the likelihood for an outcome of a random process. In the case of repeating a random experiment a large number of times (e.?g. flipping a coin), the probability is the relative frequency of a possible outcome (e.?g. head). A different view of probability is used in the ? Bayesian analysis.
- Seismic hazard :
-
The probability that a given magnitude (or peak ground acceleration) is exceeded in a seismic source zone within a pre-defined time interval, e.?g. 50 years, is denoted as the seismic hazard.
- Self-organized criticality:
-
Self-organized criticality (SOC) as introduced by Bak [2] is the ability of a system to organize itself in the vicinity of a critical point independently of values of physical parameters of the system and initial conditions. Self-organized critical systems are characterized by various power law distributions. Examples include models of sandpiles and forest-fires.
Bibliography
Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology. University ScienceBooks, Sansalito
Bak P (1996) How Nature Works. The science of self-organisedcriticality. Springer, New York
Bak P, Tang C (1989) Earthquakes as a phenomenon of self-organisedcriticality. J Geophys Res 94:15635–156637
Båth M (1965) Lateral inhomogeneities in the upper mantle. Tectonophysics2:483–514
Ben-Zion Y (1996) Stress, slip, and earthquakes in models of complexsingle-fault systems incorporating brittle and creep deformations. J Geophys Res 101:5677–5706
Ben-Zion Y (2001) Dynamic rupture in recent models of earthquake faults. J MechPhys Solids 49:2209–2244
Ben-Zion Y (2003) Appendix 2, Key Formulas in Earthquake Seismology. In: LeeWHK, Kanamori H, Jennings PC, Kisslinger C (eds) International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology, Part B. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1857–1875
Ben-Zion Y, Lyakhovsky V (2002) Accelerated seismic release and related aspectsof seismicity patterns on earthquake faults. Pure Appl Geophys 159:2385–2412
Ben-Zion Y, Lyakhovsky V (2006) Analysis of aftershocks in a lithosphericmodel with seismogenic zone governed by damage rheology. J Geophys Int 165:197–210; doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X2006.02878.x
Ben-Zion Y, Rice JR (1993) Earthquake failure sequences along a cellularfault zone in a three-dimensional elastic solid containing asperity and nonasperity regions. J Geophys Res98:14109–14131
Ben-Zion Y, Dahmen K, Lyakhovsky V, Ertas D, Agnon A (1999) Self-drivenmode switching of earthquake activity on a fault system. Earth Plan Sci Lett 172:11–21
Ben-Zion Y, Eneva M, Liu Y (2003) Large Earthquake Cycles and IntermittentCriticality On Heterogeneous Faults Due To Evolving Stress and Seismicity. J Geophys Res 108:2307; doi:10.1029/2002JB002121
Bernardo JM, Smith AFM (1994) Bayesian Theory. Wiley,Chichester
Binney JJ, Dowrick NJ, Fisher AJ, Newman MEJ (1993) The theory of criticalphenomena. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bowman DD, Oullion G, Sammis CG, Sornette A, Sornette D (1998) Anobservational test of the critical earthquake concept. J Geophys Res 103:24359–24372
Brace WF (1960) An extension of the Griffith theory of fracture to rocks. J Geophys Res 65:3477–3480
Bufe CG, Varnes DJ (1993) Predicitive modeling of the seismic cycle of thegreater San Francisco Bay region. J Geophys Res 98:9871–9883
Burridge R, Knopoff L (1967) Model and theoretical seismicity. Bull Seim SocAm 57:341–371
Byerlee JD (1978) Friction of rocks. Pure Appl Geophys116:615–616
Chinnery M (1963) The stress changes that accompany strike-slipfaulting. Bull Seim Soc Am 53:921–932
Corral Á (2004) Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in thetemporal occurrence of earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 92:108501; doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.108501
Dahmen K, Ertas D, Ben-Zion Y (1998) Gutenberg–Richter andcharacteristic earthquake behavior in simple mean-field models of heterogeneous faults. Phys Rev E 58:1494–1501
Daley DJ, Vere-Jones D (1988) An Introduction to the Theory of PointProcesses, Springer Series: Probability and its Applications. Springer, Heidelberg
Dieterich JH (1994) A constitutive law for earthquake production and itsapplication to earthquake clustering. J Geophys Res 99:2601–2618
Dor O, Rockwell TK, Ben-Zion Y (2006) Geologic observations of damageasymmetry in the structure of the San Jacinto, San Andreas and Punchbowl faults in southern California: A possible indicator for preferred rupturepropagation direction. Pure Appl Geophys 163:301–349; doi:10.1007/s00024-005-0023-9
Ellsworth WL, Matthews MV, Nadeau RM, Nishenko SP, Reasenberg PA, Simpson RW(1999) A physically based earthquake recurrence model for estimation of long-term earthquake probabilities. US Geol Surv Open-File Rept,pp 99–522
Fisher DS, Dahmen K, Ramanathan S, Ben-Zion Y (1997) Statistics of earthquakesin simple models of heterogeneous faults. Phys Rev Lett 78:4885–4888
Geller RJ, Jackson DD, Kagan YY, Mulargia F (1997) Earthquakes cannot bepredicted. Science 275:1616–1617
Gumbel EJ (1960) Multivariate Extremal Distributions. Bull Inst Int Stat37:471–475
Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1956) Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy andacceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 46:105–145
Hainzl S, Zöller G (2001) The role of disorder and stress concentration innonconservative fault systems. Phys A 294:67–84
Hainzl S, Zöller G, Kurths J (1999) Similar power laws for fore- andaftershock sequences in a spring-block model for earthquakes. J Geophys Res 104:7243–7253
Hainzl S, Zöller G, Kurths J (2000) Self-organization ofspatio-temporal earthquake clusters. Nonlin Proc Geophys 7:21–29
Hainzl S, Zöller G, Kurths J, Zschau J (2000) Seismic quiescence as anindicator for large earthquakes in a system of self-organized criticality. Geophys Res Lett 27:597–600
Hainzl S, Zöller G, Scherbaum F (2003) Earthquake clusters resulting fromdelayed rupture propagation in finit fault segments. J Geophys Res 108:2013; doi:10.1029/2001JB000610
Hillers G, Mai PM, Ben-Zion Y, Ampuero JP (2007) Statistical Properties ofSeismicity Along Fault Zones at Different Evolutionary Stages. J Geophys Int 169:515–533; doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X2006.03275.x
Huang J, Turcotte DL (1990) Are earthquakes an example of deterministic chaos?Geophys Res Lett 17:223–226
Jaumé SC, Sykes LR (1999) Evolving towards a critical point: A review ofaccelerating seismic moment/energy release prior to large and great earthquakes. Pure Appl Geophys 155:279–306
Jones LM, Molnar P (1979) Some characteristics of foreshocks and theirpossible relation to earthquake prediction and premonitory slip on faults. J Geophys Res 84:3596–3608
Kagan YY, Knopoff L (1978) Statistical study of the occurrence of shallowearthquakes. J Geophys R Astron Soc 55:67–86
Keilis-Borok VI, Soloviev AA (2003) Nonlinear Dynamics of theLithosphere and Earthquake Prediction, Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer, Heidelberg
Lomnitz-Adler J (1999) Automaton models of seismic fracture: constraintsimposed by the magnitude-frequency relation. J Geophys Res 98:17745–17756
Main IG, O'Brian G, Henderson JR (2000) Statistical physics of earthquakes:Comparison of distribution exponents for source area and potential energy and the dynamic emergence of log-periodic quanta. J Geophys Res105:6105–6126
Matthews MV, Ellsworth WL, Reasenberg PA (2002) A Brownian model forrecurrent earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 92:2233–2250
Narteau C, Shebalin P, Hainzl S, Zöller G, Holschneider M (2003) Emergence ofa band-limited power law in the aftershock decay rate of a slider-block model. Geophys Res Lett 30:1568; doi:10.1029/2003GL017110
Nur A, Booker JR (1972) Aftershocks caused by pore fluid flow? Science175:885–887
Okada Y (1992) Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults ina half space. Bull Seism Soc Am 82:1018–1040
Olami Z, Feder HS, Christensen K (1992) Self-organized criticality ina continuous, nonconservative cellular automaton modeling earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett 68:1244–1247
Omori F (1894) On the aftershocks of earthquakes. J Coll Sci Imp Univ Tokyo7:111–200
Patel JK, Kapadia CH, Owen DB (1976) Handbook of statisticaldistributions. Marcel Dekker, New York
Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central Californiaseismicity. J Geophys Res 90:5479–5495
Reid HF (1910) The Mechanics of the Earthquake, The California Earthquake ofApril 18, 1906. Report of the State Investigation Commission, vol 2. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington
Rundle JB, Klein W, Turcotte DL, Malamud BD (2000) Precursory seismicactivation and critical point phenomena. Pure Appl Geophys 157:2165–2182
Saleur H, Sammis CG, Sornette D (1996) Discrete scale invariance, complexfractal dimensions, and log-periodic fluctuations in seismicity. J Geophys Res 101:17661–17677
Savage JC, Svarc JL, Prescott WH (1999) Geodetic estimates of fault slip ratesin the San Francisco Bay area. J Geophys Res 104:4995–5002
Scholz CH (1998) Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature391:37–42
Shcherbakov R, Turcotte DL (2004) A damage mechanics model foraftershocks. Pure Appl Geophys 161:2379; doi:10.1007/s00024-004-2570-x
Shin TC, Teng TL (2001) An overview of the 1999, Chichi, Taiwan,earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91:895–913
Sornette D (2004) Self-organization and Disorder: Concepts &Tools, Springer Series in Synergetics. Springer, Heidelberg
Sornette D, Sammis CG (1995) Complex critical exponents from renormalizationgroup theory of earthquakes: Implication for earthquake predicitions. J Phys 1(5):607–619
Sornette D, Sornette A (1999) Renormalization of earthquakeaftershocks. Geophys Res Lett 6:1981–1984
Field EH et al. (2007) Special Issue: Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models. Seismol ResLett 78:1
Steacy SJ, McCloskey J, Bean CJ, Ren JW (1996) Heterogeneity ina self-organized critical earthquake model. Geophys Res Lett 23:383–386
Turcotte DL (1997) Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysics. CambridgeUniversity Press, New York
Turcotte DL, Newman WI, Shcherbakov R (2003) Micro and macroscopic models ofrock fracture. J Geophys Int 152:718–728
Utsu T (2002) Statistical features of seismicity. In: Int Assoc Seismol& Phys Earth's Interior (ed) International handbook of earthquake and engineering seismology, vol 81A. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 719–732
Utsu T, Ogata Y, Matsu'ura RS (1995) The centenary of the Omori formula fora decay law of aftershock activity. J Phys Earth 43:1–33
Wesnousky SG (1994) The Gutenberg–Richter or characteristic earthquakedistribution, which is it? Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:525–530; 84:1940–1959
Wiemer S, Baer M (2000) Mapping and removing quarry blast events from seismiccatalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:525–530
Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities (2003) Earthquakeprobabilities in the San Francisco Bay region. US Geol Survey Open File Report 03–214, US Geological Survey
Wyss M (1997) Cannot earthquakes be predicted? Science278:487
Wyss M, Habermann RE (1988) Precursory seismic quiescence. Pure Appl Geophys126:319–332
Zaliapin I, Liu Z, Zöller G, Keilis-Borok V, Turcotte DL (2002) Onincrease of earthquake correlation length prior to large earthquakes in California. Comp Seismol 33:141–161
Zöller G, Ben-Zion Y, Holschneider M, Hainzl S (2007) Estimating recurrencetimes and seismic hazard of large earthquakes on an individual fault. J Geophys Int 170:1300–1310; doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X200703480.x
Zöller G, Hainzl S (2001) Detecting premonitory seismicity patterns based oncritical point dynamics. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 1:93–98
Zöller G, Hainzl S (2002) A systematic spatiotemporal test of thecritical point hypothesis for large earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 29:1558; doi:10.1029/2002GL014856
Zöller G, Hainzl S, Kurths J (2001) Observation of growing correlation lengthas an indicator for critical point behavior prior to large earthquakes. J Geophys Res 106:2167–2175
Zöller G, Hainzl S, Kurths J, Zschau J (2002) A systematic test onprecursory seismic quiescence in Armenia. Nat Hazards 26:245–263
Zöller G, Holschneider M, Ben-Zion Y (2004) Quasi-static andquasi-dynamic modeling of earthquake failure at intermediate scales. Pure Appl Geophys 161:2103–2118; doi:10.1007/s00024-004-2551-0
Zöller G, Holschneider M, Ben-Zion Y (2005) The role of heterogeneities asa tuning parameter of earthquake dynamics. Pure Appl Geophys 162:1027; doi:10.1007/s00024-004-2660-9
Zöller G, Hainzl S, Holschneider M, Ben-Zion Y (2005) Aftershocks resultingfrom creeping sections in a heterogeneous fault. Geophys Res Lett 32:L03308; doi:10.1029/2004GL021871
Zöller G, Hainzl S, Ben-Zion Y, Holschneider M (2006) Earthquake activityrelated to seismic cycles in a model for a heterogeneous strike-slip fault. Tectonophys 423:137–145; doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2006.03.007
Acknowledgments
We thank Jürgen Kurths, James R. Rice, Frank Scherbaum, Karin Dahmen, Donald L. Turcotte, and many others for useful discussions. GZ and MH acknowledge support from the collaborative research center “Complex Nonlinear Processes” (SFB 555) of the German Research Society (DFG). SH acknowledges support from the DFG-project SCHE280/14 and the EU-project SAFER. YBZ acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation, the United States Geological Survey, and the Southern California Earthquake Center. GZ and YBZ thank the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, UC Santa Barbara, for hospitality during a 2005 program on Friction, Fracture and Earthquake Physics, and partial support based on NSF grant PHY99–0794. We thank James R. Holliday, Vladimir Keilis-Borok and Willie Lee for providing comments on the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zöller, G., Hainzl, S., Ben-Zion, Y., Holschneider, M. (2009). Seismicity, Critical States of: From Models to Practical Seismic Hazard Estimates Space. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_466
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_466
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-75888-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-30440-3
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics