Skip to main content

A Satisfiability Tester for Non-Clausal Propositional Calculus

  • Conference paper
7th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE 1984)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 170))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An algorithm for satisfiability testing in the propositional calculus with a worst case running time that grows at a rate less than 2(.25+ε)L is described, where L can be either the length of the input expression or the number of occurrences of literals (i.e., leaves) in it. This represents a new upper bound on the complexity of non-clausal satisfiability testing. The performance is achieved by using lemmas concerning assignments and pruning that preserve satisfiability, together with choosing a “good” variable upon which to recur. For expressions in clause form, it is shown that the Davis-Putnam procedure satisfies the same upper bound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9. References

  1. Aho, A.V., Hopcroft, J.E., and Ullman, J.D., The design and analysis of computer algorithms, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1974).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, S.A., “The complexity of theorem-proving procedures,” in Proc. Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, M. and Putnam, H., “A computing procedure for quantification theory,” JACM 7(2?) pp. 201–215 (1960).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Enderton, H.B., A Mathematical Introduction to Logic, Academic Press, New York, NY (1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Galil, Z., “The complexity of resolution procedures for theorem proving in the propositonal calculus,” TR 75-239, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galil, Z., “On the complexity of regular resolution and the Davis-Putnam procedure,” Theoretical Computer Science 4 pp. 23–46 (1977).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg, A.T., “On the complexity of the satisfiability problem,” NSO-16, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quine, W.V., Methods of logic. Henry Holt (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tseitin, G.S., “On the complexity of derivations in the propositional calculus,” pp. 115–125 in Studies in Constructive Mathematics and Mathematical Logic, Part II, ed. Slisenko, A.O., (1968).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Gelder, A. (1984). A Satisfiability Tester for Non-Clausal Propositional Calculus. In: Shostak, R.E. (eds) 7th International Conference on Automated Deduction. CADE 1984. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 170. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34768-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34768-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-96022-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-34768-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics