Skip to main content

Objects with Broad Boundaries

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of GIS

Synonyms

Spatial objects; Spatial data types with indeterminate boundaries; Vague boundaries; Uncertain boundaries; 3‑value indeterminacy; Fuzzy sets; Probability theory; Egg-yolk model

Definition

Objects with broad boundaries are spatial objects, whose crisp boundaries are replaced by an area expressing the boundary's uncertainty. There are two main interpretations for broad boundaries: (1) for positional uncertainty, the broad boundary represents the set of all possible positions among which the unknown boundary position is hidden; (2) for “fuzzy” boundaries, that is, boundaries that are by nature not crisp, the broad boundary represents their minimum and maximum extent. The main motivation for objects with broad boundaries is to record information about uncertainty together with the data. In this way, they represent a new geometric model that overcomes the limits of current spatial database models, which are a collection of lines (points, polylines and polygons). The geometric model...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Clementini, E.: A model for uncertain lines. J Vis Language Comput 16, 271–288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: An algebraic model for spatial objects with indeterminate boundaries. In: Burrough, P.A., Frank, A.U. (eds.) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, GISDATA Series, pp. 155–169. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: A model for representing topological relationships between complex geometric features in spatial databases. Inf Sci 90, 121–136 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: Approximate topological relations. Int J Approx Reason 16, 173–204 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P.: A spatial model for complex objects with a broad boundary supporting queries on uncertain data. Data Knowl Eng 37, 285–305 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Clementini, E., Di Felice, P., van Oosterom, P.: A small set of formal topological relationships suitable for end-user interaction. In: Abel, D., Ooi, B.C. (eds.) Advances in Spatial Databases – Third International Symposium, SSD '93. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 692, pp. 277–295. Springer, Berlin (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohn, A.G., Gotts, N.M.: The ‘egg-yolk’ representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries. In: Burrough, P.A., Frank, A.U. (eds.) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, GISDATA Series, pp. 171–187. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Egenhofer, M.J., Al-Taha, K.: Reasoning about gradual changes of topological relationships. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I., Formentini, U. (eds.) Theories and Models of Spatio-temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 639, pp. 196–219. Springer, Berlin (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Egenhofer, M.J., Herring, J.R.: Categorizing binary topological relationships between regions, lines, and points in geographic databases. Department of Surveying Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erwig, M., Schneider, M.: Vague regions. In: Scholl, M., Voisard, A. (eds.) Advances in Spatial Databases – Fifth International Symposium, SSD '97. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1262, pp. 298–320. Springer, Berlin (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frank, A.U.: Metamodels for data quality description. In: Jeansoulin, R., Goodchild, M. (eds.) Data Quality in Geographic Information – From Error to Uncertainty, pp. 15–29. Editions Hermès, Paris (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freksa, C.: Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals. Artif Intell 54, 199–227 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Guptill, S., Morrison, J.: Elements of spatial data quality. Elsevier, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider, M.: Modelling spatial objects with undetermined boundaries using the Realm/ROSE approach. In: Burrough, P.A., Frank, A.U. (eds.) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, GISDATA Series, pp. 141–152. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider, M.: Uncertainty management for spatial data in databases: fuzzy spatial data types. In: Guting, R.H., Papadias, D., Lochovsky, F. (eds.) Advances in Spatial Databases – Sixth International Symposium, SSD '99. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1651, pp. 330–351. Springer, Berlin (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tøssebro, E., Nygård, M.: An advanced discrete model for uncertain spatial data. In: Meng, X., Su, J., Wang, Y. (eds.) Advances in Web-Age Information Management, Third International Conference (WAIM'02). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2419, pp. 37–51. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Worboys, M., Clementini, E.: Integration of imperfect spatial information. J Vis Language Comput 12, 61–80 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Clementini, E. (2008). Objects with Broad Boundaries. In: Shekhar, S., Xiong, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of GIS. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35973-1_896

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics