Skip to main content

Integration of Rules and Ontologies

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Database Systems

Definition

The layered structure of the Semantic Web (see http://www.w3.org/2007/03/layerCake.png) adopted by the World Wide Web Consortium W3C includes, among others, the Ontology layer with the web ontology language OWL and the rule layer with the emerging Rule Interchange Format (RIF) http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-fld/which allows rules to be translated between rule languages. The integration of rules and ontologies aims at developing techniques for interoperability between rules and ontologies in the Semantic Web. This is necessary for rule-based applications to access existing domain ontologies. In most of the proposals the integration is achieved by defining and implementing a new language which is a common extension of a given rule language and a given ontology language, enhancing the expressive power of each of the components. Alternatively, the integration of rules and ontologies may be achieved by designing from scratch one language sufficiently expressive to define both rules...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 2,500.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Antoniou G. and Bikakis A. DR-Prolog: a system for defeasible reasoning with rules and ontologies on the semantic Web. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 19(2):233–245, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baral C. and Gelfond M. Logic programming and knowledge representation. J. Logic Program., 19/20:73–148, 1994.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. de Bruijn J., Pearce D., Polleres A., and Valverde A. 2007, Quantified equilibrium logic and hybrid rules. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, pp. 58–72.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drabent W. and Małuszyński J. 2007, Well-founded semantics for hybrid rules. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eiter T., Gottlob G., and Mannila H. Disjunctive datalog. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 22(3):364–418, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Eiter T., Lukasiewicz T., Schindlauer R., and Tompits H. Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. In Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2004, pp. 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eiter T., Lukasiewicz T., Schindlauer R., and Tompits H. 2004, Well-founded semantics for description logic programs in the semantic web. In Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web, pp. 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erdmann M. Semantic web applications. 2007, first Asian Autumn School on Semantic Web, Tutorial video at: http://rease.semanticweb.org/ubp/.

  9. Gelfond M. and Lifschitz V. The stable model semantics for logic programming. In Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Logic Programming, pp. 1070–1080.1988,

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grosof B.N. Prioritized conflict handling for logic programs. In Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Logic Programming, 1997, pp. 197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grosof B. Semantic web rules with ontologies, and their e-Services applications. 2006, iSWC06 tutorial video at: http://videolectures.net/iswc06_grosof_swrot/.

  12. Grosof B., Horrocks I., Volz R., and Decker S. Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic. In Proc. 12th Int. World Wide Web Conference, pp. 48–57.2003,

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kifer M. Rules and ontologies in F-logic. In Reasoning Web, N. Eisinger and J. Małuszyński (eds.). LCNS, vol. 3564, 2005, pp. 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knorr M., Alferes J.J., and Hitzler P. 2007, A well-founded semantics for hybrid MKNF knowledge bases. In Proc. 20th Int. Workshop on Description Logics, pp. 347–354.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Levy A. and Rousset M.C. CARIN: a representation language combining horn rules and description logics. Artif. Intell., 104(1–2):165–209, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Motik B. and Rosati R. A faithful integration of description logics with logic programming. In Proc. 20th Int. Joint Conf. on AI, 2007, pp. 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Motik B., Sattler U., and Studer R. Query answering for OWL-DL with rules. J. Web Sem., 3(1):41–60, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nilsson U. and Małuszyński J. Logic, Programming and Prolog, 2nd edn. Wiley, NY, 1995, now available free of charge at: http://www.ida.liu.se/ ulfni/lpp/.

  19. Nute D. Defeasible logic. In Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Vol. 3. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994, pp. 353–395.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosati R. 2006, DL+log: tight integration of description logics and disjunctive datalog. In Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 68–78.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sintek M. and Decker S. TRIPLE – a query, inference, and transformation language for the semantic web. In 2002, pp. 364–378

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gelder A., van Ross K.A., and Schlipf J.S. Unfounded sets and well-founded semantics for general logic programs. In Proc. 7th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symp. on Principles of Database Systems, pp. 221–230.1988,

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Małuszyński, J. (2009). Integration of Rules and Ontologies. In: LIU, L., ÖZSU, M.T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_1313

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics