Skip to main content

ISPD 2005/2006 Placement Benchmarks

  • Chapter
Modern Circuit Placement

Benchmarks can contribute significantly to algorithm development of many fields by providing a common basis for quantitative measurement and comparison. The early MCNC benchmarks and ISPD98 benchmarks [1] helped the academic community significantly to measure the advances in physical design in 1990s. While still being used extensively in placement and floorplanning research, those benchmarks can no longer be considered representative of today’s physical design challenges. To further aid future advances in placement, new benchmark suites, dubbed as ISPD 2005/2006 Placement Benchmarks, have been released in conjunction with ISPD placement contests. There are total 16 benchmark circuits that are directly derived from modern industrial ASIC designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Alpert, “The ISPD98 Circuit Benchmark Suite,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 1998, pp. 80-85

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Agnihotri, S. Ono and P. Madden, “Recursive Bisection Placement: Feng Shui 5.0 Implementation Details,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 230-232

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.E. Caldwell, A.B. Kahng, I.L. Markov, VLSI cad bookshelf. http://vlsicad. eecs.umich.edu/BK/. See also Caldwell AE, Kahng AB, Markov IL (2002) Toward cad-ip reuse: the marco gsrc bookshelf of fundamental cad algorithms. IEEE Design and Test 72-81

  4. T.F. Chan, J. Cong, M. Romesis, J.R. Shinnerl, K. Sze and M. Xie, “mPL6: A Robust Multilevel Mixed-Size Placement Engine,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 227-229

    Google Scholar 

  5. T.F. Chan, J. Cong, J.R. Shinnerl, K. Sze and M. Xie, “mPL6: Enhanced Multilevel Mixed-Size Placement,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2006, pp. 212-214

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.-C. Chen, T.-C. Hsu, Z.-W. Jiang and Y.-W. Chang, “NTUplace: A Ratio Partitioning Based Placement Algorithm for Large-Scale Mixed-Size Designs,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 236-238

    Google Scholar 

  7. Z.-W. Jiang, T.-C. Chen, T.-C. Hsu, H.-C. Chen and Y.-W. Chang, “NTUplace2: A Hybrid Placer Using Partitioning and Analytical Techniques,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2006, pp. 215-217

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Hu, Y. Zeng and M. Marek-Sadowska, “mFAR: Fixed-Points-Addtion-Based VLSI Placement Algorithm,” Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 239-241

    Google Scholar 

  9. A.B. Kahng, S. Reda, and Q. Wang, “APlace: A General Analytic Placement Framework,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 233-235

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.B. Kahng, and Q. Wang, “A Faster Implementation of APlace,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2006, pp. 218-220

    Google Scholar 

  11. G.-J. Nam, C.J. Alpert, P. Villarrubia, B. Winter and M. Yildiz, “The ISPD2005 Placement Contest and Benchmark Suite,”, in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 216-220

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gi-Joon Nam, “ISPD 2006 placement contest: Benchmark suite and results,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Physical Design, pages 167-167, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Obermeier, H. Ranke and F. M. Johannes, “Kraftwerk - A Versatile Placement Approach,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 242-244

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.A. Roy, D.A. Papa, S.N. Adya, H.H. Chan A.N. Ng, J.F. Lu and I.L. Markov, “Capo: Robust and Scalable Open-Source Min-Cut Floorplacer,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 224-226

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.A. Roy, D.A. Papa, A.N. Ng and I.L. Markov, “Satisfying Whitespace Requirements in Top-down Placement,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2006, pp. 206-28

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Taghavi, X. Yang, B.K. Choi, M. Wang and M. Sarrafzadeh, “DRAGON2005: LargeScale Mixed-Size Placement Tool,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 245-247

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Taghavi, X. Yang, B.K. Choi, M. Wang and M. Sarrafzadeh, “DRAGON2006: Blockage-Aware Congestion-Controlling Mixed-Size Placer,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2006, pp. 209-211

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Viswanathan, M. Pan and C.C. -N. Chu, “FastPlace: An Analytical Placer for MixedMode Designs,” in Proc. ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, 2005, pp. 221-223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nam, GJ., Alpert, C.J., Villarrubia, P.G. (2007). ISPD 2005/2006 Placement Benchmarks. In: Nam, GJ., Cong, J. (eds) Modern Circuit Placement. Series on Integrated Circuits and Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68739-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68739-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-36837-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-68739-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics