Skip to main content

Solving the Capacitated Multi-Facility Weber Problem by Simulated Annealing, Threshold Accepting and Genetic Algorithms

  • Chapter
Metaheuristics

Abstract

In this paper we focus on the capacitated multi-facility Weber problem with rectilinear, Euclidean, squared Euclidean and l p distances. This problem deals with locating m capacitated facilities in the Euclidean plane so as to satisfy the demand of n customers at the minimum total transportation cost. The location and the demand of each customer is known a priori and the transportation cost is proportional to the distance and the amount of .ow between customers and facilities. We present three new heuristic methods each of which is based on one of the three well-known metaheuristic approaches: simulated annealing, threshold accepting, and genetic algorithms. Computational results on benchmark instances indicate that the heuristics perform well in terms of the quality of solutions they generate. Furthermore, the simulated annealing-based heuristic implemented with the two-variable exchange neighborhood structure outperforms the other heuristics considered in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Al-Loughani, I., 1997, Algorithmic approaches for solving the Euclidean distance location-allocation problems, PhD Dissertation, Industrial and System Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburgh, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazaraa, M.S., Jarvis, J.J., and Sherali, H.D., 1990, Linear Programming and Network Flows. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimberg, J. and Love, R.F., 1993, Global convergence of a generalized iterative procedure for the minisum location problem with lp distances, Operations Research 41:1153–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L., 1972, The transportation-location problem, Operations Research 20:94–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L., 1976, An e.cient heuristic algorithm for the transportationlocation problem, Journal of Regional Science 16:309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dongarra, J., 2006, Performance of various computers using standard linear equations software, Technical Report available online at http:// www.netlib.org/benchmark/performance.ps

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueck, G. and Scheuer, T., 1990, Threshold accepting: A general purpose optimization algorithm appearing superior to simulated annealing, Journal of Computational Physics 90:161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C. and Gottlieb, J., 2002, Direct Representation and Variation Operators for the Fixed Charge Transportation Problem, in: Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN VII, Granada, Spain, pp. 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis R.L., McGinnis, L.F., and White, J.A., 1992, Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb J. and Paulmann, L., 1998, Genetic algorithms for the .xed charge transportation problem, in: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Anchorage, Alaska, pp. 330–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, J. and Eckert, C., 2000, A comparison of two representations for the .xed charge transportation problem, in: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature– PPSN VI, Berlin, Germany, pp. 345–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, J., Julstrom, B., Raidl, G., and Rothlauf, F., 2001, Prüfer numbers: A poor representation of spanning trees for evolutionary search, in: Proceedings of the 2001 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, San Francisco, California, pp. 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. and Mladenović, N., 2001, Variable neighborhood search: Principles and applications. European Journal of Operational Research 130:449–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P., Perreur, J., and Thisse, F., 1980, Location theory, dominance and convexity: Some further results, Operations Research 28:1241– 1250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D., and Vecchi, M.P., 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 4598:671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Gen, M., and Ida, K., 1998, Fixed charge transportation problem by spanning tree-based genetic algorithm, Beijing Mathematics 4:239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlmann, J.W., and Thomas, B.W., 2006, A compressed annealing approach to the traveling salesman problem with time windows, INFORMS Journal on Computing, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selim, S., 1979, Biconvex programming and deterministic and stochastic location allocation problems, Ph. D. dissertation, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H.D. and Nordai, F.L., 1988, NP-hard, capacitated, balanced pmedian problems on a chain graph with a continuum of link demands, Mathematics of Operations Research 13:32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H.D. and Tunçbilek, C.H., 1992, A squared-Euclidean distance location-allocation problem. Naval Research Logistics 39:447–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H.D. and Adams, W.P., 1999, A reformulation-linearization technique for solving discrete and continuous nonconvex problems, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H.D., Ramachandran, S., and Kim, S., 1994, A localization and reformulation discrete programming approach for the rectilinear distance location-allocation problem, Discrete Applied Mathematics 49:357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherali, H.D., Al-Loughani, I., and Subramanian, S., 2002, Global optimization procedures for the capacitated Euclidean and l p distance multifacility location-allocation problems, Operations Research 50:433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiszfeld, E., 1937, Sur le point lequel la somme des distances de n points donné est minimum, Tôhoku Mathematics Journal 43:355–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesolowsky, G., 1993, The Weber problem: history and perspectives, Location Science 1:5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, S. and Luo, S.C., 1999, Probabilistic local search algorithms for concave cost transportation network problems, European Journal of Operational Research 117:511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aras, N., Yumusak, S., Altmel, I.K. (2007). Solving the Capacitated Multi-Facility Weber Problem by Simulated Annealing, Threshold Accepting and Genetic Algorithms. In: Doerner, K.F., Gendreau, M., Greistorfer, P., Gutjahr, W., Hartl, R.F., Reimann, M. (eds) Metaheuristics. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, vol 39. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71921-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics