In this chapter we compare the DIANE and miAamics solutions to service discovery along a specific feature supported by those solutions: preferences. Although quite different in their theoretical and technical background, both techniques have in fact the ability to express user preferences, that are used internally to rank the evaluation results. These preferences are used here to incorporate functional aspects as defined by the SWS Challenge tasks, but they can also be used to express non-functional properties like quality aspects. Here we take a closer look at how preferences are realized in the two different approaches and we briefly compare their profiles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Küster, U., König-Ries, B., Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (2009). Comparison: Handling Preferences with DIANE and miAamics. In: Petrie, C., Margaria, T., Lausen, H., Zaremba, M. (eds) Semantic Web Services Challenge. Semantic Web And Beyond, vol 8. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72496-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72496-6_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-72495-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-72496-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)