Skip to main content

Earprints, Forensic Evidence of

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Biometrics
  • 376 Accesses

Synonyms

Earprints; Earmark(s); Identification; ACE-V

Definition

Forensic evidence of earprint is the field of forensic science devoted to the collection and comparison of earmark(s) (generally left in association to a crime scene) with earprints obtained from ears of individuals of interest under controlled condition. Anthropometric studies and empirical evidence have shown that the forms left by an ear are very discriminating and allow bringing evidence of reasonable strength regarding the identity of sources.

Current research aims at bringing structured data relevant to the forensic examination process and move from a field dominated by subjectively informed experience and anecdotal evidence to a field where transparent data allows an assessment of the case.

Introduction

The use of earmarks in forensic science is a consequence of the recovery of such marks during crime scene investigation. Earmarks are left on surfaces where one applies his or her ear to listen. The deposition...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lugt, C.: van der Earprint Identification. Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie, Gravenhage (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Iannarelli, A.V.: Ear Identification. Paramont Publishing Company, Fremont, CA (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, M.A.: The Supreme Court's Trilogy on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony. In: Federal Judicial Center (ed.) Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. Federal Judicial Center, Washington, 9–38 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hirschi, F.: Identifizierung von Ohrenabdrüken. Kriminalistik. 24(2), 75–79 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirschi, F.: Cambrioleurs internationaux convaincus à l'aide de preuves peu communes. Revue internationale de police criminelle 25(239), 184–193 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. v. Mark Dallagher, UK Court of Appeal, EWCA Crim 1903, July 25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Anon. Cases in Brief. Archbold News. 2003; September 19(8)

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. v. Mark J. Kempster, UK Court of Appeal, EWCA Crim 3555

    Google Scholar 

  9. State v. D. W. Kunze, Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2, 97 Wash. App. 832, 988 P.2d 977

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cwiklik, C., Sweeney, K.M.: Ear Print Evidence: State of Washington v. Kunze. Personal communication from Cwiklik & Associates, 2400 Sixth Avenue South #257, Seattle, WA 98134; 2003

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meijerman, L., Sholl, S., De Conti, F., Giacon, M., van der Lugt, C., Drusini, A., et al. Exploratory Study on Classification and Individualisation of Earprints. Forensic Sci Int. 40, 91–99 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meijerman, L., Nagelkerke, N., Brand, R., van der Lugt, C., van Basten, R., De Conti, F.: Exploring the Effect of Occurrence of Sound on Force Applied by the Ear when Listening at a Surface. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology. 1(3), 187–192 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meijerman, L., Nagelkerke, N., van Basten, R., van der Lugt, C., De Conti, F., Drusini, A., et al. Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation in Applied Force when Listening at a Surface, and Resulting Variation in Earprints. Medicine Science and the Law. 46(2), 141–151 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alberink, I.B., Ruifrok, A.C.C., Kieckhoefer, H.: Interoperator Test for Anatomical Annotation of Earprints. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 51(6), 1246–1254 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alberink, I., Ruifrok, A.: Performance of the FearID earprint identification system. Forensic Science International. 166(2–3), 145–154 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Meijerman, L., Thean, A., van der Lugt, C., van Munster, R., van Antwerpen, G., Maat, G.: Individualization of earprints. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology. 2(1), 39–49 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choras, M.: Ear Biometrics Based on Geometrical Method of Feature Extraction. AMDO. 2004;LNCS 3179:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pun, K.H., Moon, Y.S.: Recent Advances in Ear Biometrics. In: Proceeding of the Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FRG'04). 2004

    Google Scholar 

  19. Choras, M.: Ear Biometrics Based on Geometrical Feature Extraction. Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis. 5(3), 84–95 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hurley, D.J., Nixon, M.S., Carter, J.N.P: Force Field Feature Extraction for Ear Biometrics. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 98, 491–512 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lammi, H-K.: Ear Biometrics. Lappeenranta, Finland: Lappeenranta University of Technology (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Champod, C. (2009). Earprints, Forensic Evidence of. In: Li, S.Z., Jain, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Biometrics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73003-5_105

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics