Article Outline
Keywords
Multicriteria Sorting Methods
Goal Programming Approaches
Outranking Relations Approaches
Preference Disaggregation Approaches
A Multigroup Hierarchical Discrimination Method
Model Formulation
The Hierarchical Discrimination Process
Estimation of Utility Functions
LP1: Minimizing the Overall Classification Error
LP2: Minimizing the Number of Misclassifications
LP3: Maximizing the Minimum Distance
An Illustrative Example
Distinguishing Between C 1 and C 2-C 3
Distinguishing Between C 2 and C 3
Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives
See also
References
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abad PL, Banks WJ (1993) New LP based heuristics for the classification problem. Europ J Oper Res 67:88–100
Bajgier SM, Hill AV (1982) A comparison of statistical and linear programming approaches to the discriminant problem. Decision Sci 13:604–618
Banks WJ, Abad PL (1991) An efficient optimal solution algorithm for the classification problem. Decision Sci 22:1008–1023
Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961) Managem. models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York
Choo E-U, Wedley WC (1985) Optimal criterion weights in repetitive multicriteria decision-making. J Oper Res Soc 36(11):983–992
Devaud JM, Groussaud G, Jacquet–Lagrèze E (1980) UTADIS: Une méthode de construction de fonctions d'utilité additives rendant compte de jugements globaux. Europ Working Group on Multicriteria Decision Aid, Bochum
Doumpos M, Zopounidis C (1998) The use of the preference disaggregation analysis in the assessment of financial risks. Fuzzy Economic Rev 3(1):39–57
Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugenics 7:179–188
Freed N, Glover F (1981) A linear programming approach to the discriminant problem. Decision Sci 12:68–74
Freed N, Glover F (1981) Simple but powerful goal programming models for discriminant problems. Europ J Oper Res 7:44–60
Freed N, Glover F (1986) Evaluating alternative linear programming models to solve the two-group discriminant problem. Decision Sci 17:151–162
Glover F (1990) Improved linear programming models for discriminant analysis. Decision Sci 21:771–785
Glover F, Keene S, Duea B (1988) A new class of models for the discriminant problem. Decision Sci 19:269–280
Gochet W, Stam A, Srinivasan V, Chen S (1997) Multigroup discriminant analysis using linear programming. Oper Res 45(2):213–225
Horsky D, Rao MR (1984) Estimation of attribute weights from preference comparisons. Managem Sci 30(7):801–822
Jacquet–Lagrèze E (1995) An application of the UTA discriminant model for the evaluation of R&D projects. In: Pardalos PM, Siskos Y, Zopounidis C (eds) Advances in Multicriteria Analysis. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 203–211
Jacquet–Lagrèze E, Siskos Y (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making, the UTA method. Europ J Oper Res 10:151–164
Joachimsthaler EA, Stam A (1988) Four approaches to the classification problem in discriminant analysis: An experimental study. Decision Sci 19:322–333
Khoury NT, Martel JM (1990) The relationship between risk-return characteristics of mutual funds and their size. Finance 11(2):67–82
Koehler GJ, Erenguc SS (1990) Minimizing misclassifications in linear discriminant analysis. Decision Sci 21:63–85
Mangasarian OL (1968) Multisurface method for patter separation. IEEE Trans Inform Theory IT-14(6):801–807
Markowski CA, Markowski EP (1987) An experimental comparison of several approaches to the discriminant problem with both qualitative and quantitative variables. Europ J Oper Res 28:74–78
Markowski EP, Markowski CA (1985) Some difficulties and improvements in applying linear programming formulations to the discriminant problem. Decision Sci 16:237–247
Massaglia M, Ostanello A (1991) N-TOMIC: A decision support for multicriteria segmentation problems. In: Korhonen P (ed) Internat. Workshop Multicriteria Decision Support, vol 356. Lecture Notes Economics and Math Systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–174
Mousseau V, Slowinski R (1998) Inferring an ELECTRE-TRI model from assignment examples. J Global Optim 12(2):157–174
Nakayama H, Kagaku N (1992) Pattern classification by linear goal programming and its extensions. J Global Optim 12(2):111–126
Pekelman D, Sen SK (1974) Mathematical programming models for the determination of attribute weights. Managem Sci 20(8):1217–1229
Perny P (1998) Multicriteria filtering methods based on concordance and non-discordance principles. Ann Oper Res 80:137–165
Ragsdale CT, Stam A (1991) Mathematical programming formulations for the discriminant problem: An old dog does new tricks. Decision Sci 22:296–307
Roy B (1985) Méthodologie multicritère d'aide à la décision. Economica, Paris
Roy B, Moscarola J (1977) Procédure automatique d'examem de dossiers fondée sur une segmentation trichotomique en présence de critéres multiples. RAIRO Rech Opérat 11(2):145–173
Rubin PA (1990) A comparison of linear programming and parametric approaches to the two- group discriminant problem. Decision Sci 21:373–386
Rubin PA (1990) Heuristic solution procedures for a mixed-integer programming discriminant model. Managerial and Decision Economics 11:255–266
Smith C (1947) Some examples of discrimination. Ann Eugenics 13:272–282
Srinivasan V, Shocker AD (1973) Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgements. Psychometrika 38(4):473–493
Srinivasan V, Shocker AD (1973) Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences. Psychometrika 38(3):337–396
Stam A, Joachimsthaler EA (1989) Solving the classification problem via linear and nonlinear programming methods. Decision Sci 20:285–293
Stam A, Joachimsthaler EA (1990) A comparison of a robust mixed-integer approach to existing methods for establishing classification rules for the discriminant problem. Europ J Oper Res 46:113–122
Wilson JM (1996) Integer programming formulation of statistical classification problems. OMEGA Internat J Management Sci 24(6):681–688
Yu W (1992) ELECTRE TRI: Aspects methodologiques et manuel d'utilisation. Document du Lamsade (Univ Paris-Dauphine) 74
Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (1997) A multicriteria decision aid methodology for the assessment of country risk. In: Zopounidis C, Garcia Vázquez JM (eds) Managing in Uncertainty. Proc VI Internat Conf AEDEM, AEDEM Ed, pp 223–236
Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (1997) Preference disaggregation methodology in segmentation problems: The case of financial distress. In: Zopounidis C (ed) New Operational Approaches for Financial Modelling. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 417–439
Zopounidis C, Doumpos M (1998) A multi-group hierarchical discrimination method for managerial decision problems: The M.H.DIS method. In: Paper Presented at the EURO XVI Conf.: Innovation and Quality of Life, Brussels, 12–15 July
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M. (2008). Multicriteria Sorting Methods . In: Floudas, C., Pardalos, P. (eds) Encyclopedia of Optimization. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74759-0_410
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-74759-0_410
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-74758-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-74759-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering