Skip to main content

Utility Model-Based Adaptation of Multimedia Content

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Multimedia

Synonyms

Cross-modal utility models; Adaptation decision taking engine

Definition

Utility model-based adaptation is used to provide the best possible experience to the user consuming multimedia content under given user preferences, device, and network constraints.

Introduction

Today, multimedia content must be distributed to different devices such as desktop computers, PDAs, and mobile phones. In many delivery situations, the clients are unable to receive and process the content in original quality because of resource limitations, e.g., limited network throughput. One approach to deal with this problem is to employ adaptation of the multimedia content to the actual usage context in order to comply with the given device/network capabilities and constraints. Under the vision of Universal Multimedia Access (UMA) [1], such adaptive multimedia systems have for several years attracted significant research efforts. Typical adaptive multimedia frameworks to date try to consider the technical...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Vetro, C. Christopoulos, and T. Ebrahimi, (Eds.), “Special Issue on Universal Multimedia Access,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Vol. 20, No. 2, March 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Jannach, K. Leopold, C. Timmerer, and H. Hellwagner, “A Knowledge-Based Framework for Multimedia Adaptation,” Applied Intelligence, Vol. 24, No. 2, April 2006, pp. 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. López, J.M. Martínez, and V. Valdés, “Multimedia Content Adaptation within the CAIN Framework via Constraints Satisfaction and Optimization,” Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Adaptive Multimedia Retrieval (AMR) – Springer LNCS 3877, Geneva, Switzerland, July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Pereira and I. Burnett, “Universal Multimedia Experiences for Tomorrow,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, Vol. 20, No. 2, Mar. 2003, pp. 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Knoche, J.D. McCarthy, and M.A. Sasse, “Can Small Be Beautiful? Assessing Image Resolution Requirements for Mobile TV,” Proceedings of ACM Multimedia, pp. 829–838, November 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.C. Thang, Y.J. Jung, and Y.M. Ro, “Modality Conversion for QoS Management in Universal Multimedia Access,” IEE Proceedings – Vision, Image, and Signal Processing, Vol. 152, June 2005, pp. 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T.C. Thang, Y.J. Jung, and Y.M. Ro, “Semantic Quality for Content-Aware Video Adaptation,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP’05), pp. 1–4, October 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Winkler and C. Faller, “Audiovisual Quality Evaluation of Low-Bitrate Video,” Proceedings of the SPIE/IS&T Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, Vol. 5666, January 2005, pp. 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D.S. Hands, “A Basic Multimedia Quality Model,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 6, No. 6, Dec. 2004, pp. 806–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Prangl, T. Szkaliczki, and H. Hellwagner, “A Framework for Utility-based Multimedia Adaptation,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 17, No. 6, June 2007, pp. 719–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Prangl, H. Hellwagner, and T. Szkaliczki, “A Semantic-Based Multi-Modal Utility Approach for Multimedia Adaptation,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Services (WIAMIS), pp. 67–70, April 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Prangl, H. Hellwagner, and T. Szkaliczki, “Fast Adaptation Decision Taking for Cross-modal Multimedia Content Adaptation,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 137–140, July 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. ITU-R BT500–11, Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television pictures, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Prangl, R. Bachlechner, and H. Hellwagner, “A Hybrid Recommender Strategy for Personalised Utility-Based Cross-Modal Multimedia Adaptation,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 1707–1710, July 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Mukherjee, E. Delfosse, J-G. Kim, and Y. Wang, “Optimal Adaptation Decision-Taking for Terminal and Network Quality of Service,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 7, No. 3, June 2005, pp. 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Tuy, “Monotonic Optimization: Problems and Solution Approaches,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2000, pp. 464–494.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Rich and K. Knight, Artificial Intelligence, MacGraw-Hill, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Prangl, M., Hellwagner, H., Szkaliczki, . (2008). Utility Model-Based Adaptation of Multimedia Content. In: Furht, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Multimedia. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78414-4_70

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics