Abstract
The process of reaction to system failures and security attacks is strongly influenced by its infrastructural, procedural and organisational settings. Analysis of reaction procedures and practices from different domains (Air Traffic Management, Response to Computer Security Incident, Response to emergencies, recovery in Chemical Process Industry) highlight three key requirements for this activity: smooth collaboration and coordination among responders, accurate monitoring and management of resources and ability to adapt pre-established reaction plans to the actual context. The SERENITY Reaction Mechanisms (SRM) is the subsystem of the SERENITY Run-time Framework aimed to provide SERENITY aware AmI settings (i.e. socio-technical systems with highly distributed dynamic services) with functionalities to implement applications specific reaction strategies. The SRM uses SERENITY Organisational S&D Patterns as run-time models to drive these three key functionalities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
International Civil Aviation Organization (2005) Threat and Error Management (TEM) in Air Traffic Control. PRELIMINARY EDITION. http://www.flightsafety.org/pdf/tem/tem_icao_10-05.pdf. Accessed July 2008
Alberts C, Dorofee A, Killcrece G, Ruefle R, Zajicek M (2004) Defining Incident Management Processes for CSIRTs: A Work in Progress.
Grance T, Kent K, Kim B (2004) Computer Security Incident Handling Guide. NIST Special Publication: 800–861
Van de Walle B, Turoff M (2007) Emergency Response Systems: Emerging Trends and Technologies. Communications of the ACM Vol.50. No.3
Kanse L, van der Schaaf TW, Vrijland ND, van Mierlo H, Comparing Two Approaches to Failure Recovery: Medication Preparation versus Chemical Plants,
Merisol M, Saidane A (2000) A tool to Support Function Allocation. Workshop on Safety and Usability Concern in Aviation, Toulouse (France)
Carver L, Turoff M (2007) Human-Computer Interaction: the Human and Computer as a Team in Emergency Management Information Systems. Communications of the ACM Vol.50. No.3
Roth EM, Multer J, Raslear T (2006) Shared Situation Awareness as a Contributor to High Reliability Performance. In Railroad Operations Organization Studies 27: 967–987.
SERENITY Project (2006) Security and privacy requirements at organisational level. SERENITY Deliverable A1.D2.1
SERENITY Project (2008) Enhanced version of network and devices security analysis and verification tools. SERENITY Deliverable A3.D3.2
Dix A, Rodden T, Davies N, Trevor J, Friday A, Palfreyman K (2000) Exploiting Space and Location as a Design Framework for Interactive Mobile Systems. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 7, No. 3
Agrawal A et al (2007) WS-BPEL Extension for People (BPEL4People), Version 1.0. http://download.boulder.ibm.com/ibmdl/pub/software/dw/specs/ws-bpel4people/WS-HumanTask_v1.pdf. Accessed July 2008
SERENITY Project (2008) Extended set of S&D patterns at organizational level. SERENITY Deliverable A1.D3.2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag US
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giacomo, V.D., Presenza, D., Riccucci, C. (2009). Organisational Pattern Driven Recovery Mechanisms. In: Kokolakis, S., Gómez, A., Spanoudakis, G. (eds) Security and Dependability for Ambient Intelligence. Advances in Information Security, vol 45. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88775-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88775-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-88774-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-88775-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)